Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE PROSECUTION WITNESSES BEING AN ESSENTIAL RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED, IT IS EVIDENT THAT NON-CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE SAID WITNESSES WILL PUT THE PETITIONER TO PREJUDICE: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice S.K. Panigrahi in the case of Pidika Sambaru v

THE HIGH COURT OF ODISHA DENIES TO GRANT BAIL TO A PERSON FOR RAPING A WOMAN ON THE PRETEXT OF GETTING MARRIED TO HER
June 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Sanjeeb Kumar Panigrahi in the case of Rajendr

ODISHA HIGH COURT UPHOLDS THE JUDGEMENT OF REFUSAL OF GRANTING DEFAULT BAIL TO A PERSON ACCUSED OF POSTING INAPPROPRIATE PICTURES OF A WOMAN ON FACEBOOK
June 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Sanjeeb Kumar Panigrahi in the case of Satyan

NOTA is not applicable where the candidate is uncontestedly declared as winner: Andhra Pradesh High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh through the learned Division Bench of CHIEF JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI AND JUST

Bail granted to CEO and two directors of the industry in styrene gas release case as their role is minimum and chances to suppress there investigation are unlikely: Andhra Pradesh High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh through the learned bench led by HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENKATA RAMANA in

Reduction in punishment to accused as he has to look after his children and the incident has happened 17 years ago: Telangana High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Telangana through the learned bench led by HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN in the case o

No Evidence Against Him’: The Court Dismisses the POCSO Case Against the Bishop: Karnataka High Court.
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

 The Court Dismisses POCSO Case Against Bishop, Finding ‘No Material Against Him’, is upheld by the High Court of Karnataka through th

A person’s right to choose a spouse should not be subject to societal or legal interference: Karnataka high court.
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

It is ultimately up to the persons in a relationship to determine whether or not they are a good fit for one another. There can be no interference

Disputes between landlords and tenants governed by the Transfer of Property Act are arbitrable by character: Karnataka high court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The parties to the lease agreement, which was controlled by the Transfer of Property Act, might submit their landlord-tenant problems to arbitratio

There is a difference between “related witness” and “interested witness” as “Interested witness” is a witness who is vitally interested in the conviction of a person due to previous enmity : Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Pappu @ Matiuddin vs State Of M.P. (Cr.A.No. 246 of 2010) upheld that there is a difference between &#