Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
No Court can travel beyond the facts mentioned and considered therein to cull out “ratio decidendi”: Rajasthan High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Justice Mahendar Jumar Goyal in the case of Mukesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal M

NO SCOPE FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF CT & GST TO ENTERTAIN AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF INSTALMENT: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Justices Jawant Singh and Murahari Sri Raman i

VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE CANNOT BE COMPLETELY EXEMPTED FROM THE OPERATION OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 (‘RTI’): ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar and Justice Radha Kr

Court stayed all construction activities within 1000 metres of Kumbhalgarh Forest Reserve: Rajasthan High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Chief Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani in the case of Rituraj Singh Rathore v. S

Court sought State’s response in PIL filed to monitor pollution caused by wood-based industries: Rajasthan High Court
Court sought State’s response in PIL filed to monitor pollution caused by wood-based industries: Rajasthan High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Chief Justice Govind Mathur Justice Ajai Kumar Srivastava in the case of Uday Educare And Welf

Magistrate can refuse the request to issue summons to the witness on the ground that it is made for the purpose of vexation or delay or for defeating the ends of justice : Tripura High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Milan Paul vs Smt. Rikta Paul (Crl. Rev. P No.43 of 2021) upheld that magistrate can refuse the request t

The inherent power under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used by the High Court to reopen or alter an order disposing of a petition decided on merits : Tripura High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Ramendra Kishore Bhattacharjee vs Smt. Madhurima Bhattacharjee (Crl.Petn.No.53 of 2021) upheld that the inher

If the detenu was not prejudiced by non-supply of a particular document, the detenu cannot gain any benefit merely by agitating that a document mentioned in the detention order was not supplied to him : Tripura High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Sushanta Kumar Banik vs The State Of Tripura (WP(C)(HC) 06/2021) upheld that unless the detenu can show a

‘Bar U/S 362 CrPC Not Applicable’: Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In Shivam Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others (Misc. Criminal Case No. 21851 of 2022), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench, recen

Conversion Of Wife’s Conviction U/S 302 IPC For Burning Husband To Death To S.304: Madhya Pradesh HC
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In Rajaram and ors v State of MP (CRA No.38/2012), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench, recently converted the conviction of the Appellants