Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
MPERC is a special authority constituted under the Indian Electricity Act as well as the M.P. Electricity Supply Code to decide the dispute between the consumer and the licensee / Company under the M.P. Electricity Supply Code 2013: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
MPERC is a special authority constituted under the Indian Electricity Act as well as the M.P. Electricity Supply Code to decide the dispute between the consumer and the licensee / Company under the M.P. Electricity Supply Code 2013: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 25, 2022by Primelegal Team

The writ appeal stands allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of MADHYA PRADESH PASHCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMIT

If a Private Criminal Complaint u/S 200 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for impleading other persons as accused making allegations that the police is intentionally not taking action against them, then certainly the same can only be considered by the Court of JMFC, who had taken the cognizance in the matter: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
If a Private Criminal Complaint u/S 200 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for impleading other persons as accused making allegations that the police is intentionally not taking action against them, then certainly the same can only be considered by the Court of JMFC, who had taken the cognizance in the matter: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 25, 2022by Primelegal Team

This petition is partly allowed only to the extent that direction given to the applicants to remain present before the trial Court on 12.8.2021 and

There are material omissions and contradictions in the testimonies of the material prosecution witnesses most of whom have also not supported the case of the prosecution: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 25, 2022by Primelegal Team

The appeal stands allowed disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of HABU@SUNIL V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH through HO

The respondents through their counsel made a statement that they do not intend to create any third party rights: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The respondents through their counsel made a statement that they do not intend to create any third party rights: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 24, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Review Petition stands disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of VIRENDRA SINGH MEHTA V. HEMANT MEHTA through HON

The competence of the state government in respect of the amendment of the Act of 1973 is not in dispute and is also not underchallenged: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 24, 2022by Primelegal Team

The petition sans merit and substance hence accordingly dismissed with a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited in the CCD of the State by HIGH COURT

The Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Rules, 1997 have no bearing on the issue that whether an application for review is maintainable in respect of an order passed in an appeal under s.37 of the Act of 1996: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Rules, 1997 have no bearing on the issue that whether an application for review is maintainable in respect of an order passed in an appeal under s.37 of the Act of 1996: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 24, 2022by Primelegal Team

The maintainability of this review petition is hereby rejected by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S PRESTIGE FEEDMILLS LTD.

In non-compoundable cases, the High Court has the authority to halt criminal proceedings based on an agreement reached by the parties: Punjab and Haryana High court
In non-compoundable cases, the High Court has the authority to halt criminal proceedings based on an agreement reached by the parties: Punjab and Haryana High court
August 24, 2022by Primelegal Team

In non-compoundable cases, the High Court has the authority to halt criminal proceedings based on an agreement reached by the parties is upheld by

Plaintiff is the rightful owner and occupier of the property described in the plaint schedule and the defendant, who is the plaintiff’s son-in-law, has no legal authority to impede that possession: Kerala High Court
Plaintiff is the rightful owner and occupier of the property described in the plaint schedule and the defendant, who is the plaintiff’s son-in-law, has no legal authority to impede that possession: Kerala High Court
August 24, 2022by Primelegal Team

Plaintiff is the rightful owner and occupier of the property described in the plaint schedule and the defendant, who is the plaintiff’s son-i

It is improper for parents or teachers to physically chastise children but when administered in the justified reprimand of a child, hurt of a less serious crime is not illegal: Kerala High Court
It is improper for parents or teachers to physically chastise children but when administered in the justified reprimand of a child, hurt of a less serious crime is not illegal: Kerala High Court
August 24, 2022by Primelegal Team

It is improper for parents or teachers to physically chastise children but when administered in the justified reprimand of a child, hurt of a less

For an erroneous application of the law, the award does not need to be overturned: Bombay High Court
August 24, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Bombay High Court on 20th August 2022 ruled that when the court is confident that the Arbitrator erred solely on specific issues and that the a