Primelegal Team, Author at Prime Legal Law Firm

Application U/S 311 CrPC to Summon Material Witnesses Should Ordinarily Be Allowed: Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court has said that an application made by the accused under Section 311 of the CrPC for the summoning of material witnesses should

Nomination Doesn’t Confer Any Beneficial Interest On Nominee; Legal Heirs Entitled To Claim As Per Succession: MP High Court

As the Madhya Pradesh High Court recently pointed out, a nominee is merely an authorised hand to receive the insurance amount, which is subject to

Court Directs police to probe Arya Samaj for allegations of unauthorized religious conversions: MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

The Madya Pradesh High Court recently directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh) to get an investigation done into the

Punishment Prescribed U/S 27(d) Of Drugs & Cosmetics Act Can Be Reduced If Plea Bargain is Entered Into by Accused: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has upheld a trial court order imposing a sentence less than the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 27(d) of the

To Shift Burden of Proof On Accused U/S 106 Evidence Act Prosecution Must Establish Facts Indicating ‘Special Knowledge’ : Karnataka High Court

Karnataka High Court held that Prosecution Must Establish Facts Indicating ‘Special Knowledge’ To Shift Burden of Proof On Accused U/S

Discharge from Public Duty Is Completely irrelevant to Separation from Service: MP HIGHCOURT

Recently, a writ case was rejected by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on the grounds that the petitioner was challenging a termination order given by

Former DGP RB Sreekumar granted interim bail: Gujrat High Court

The Gujarat High Court on Wednesday granted interim bail to former Director General of Police of Gujarat, RB Sreekumar who was arrested by the Guja

The Concept of Separate Legal Entity by The House of Lords

The principle of Separate Legal Entity is a fundamental principle of Company law. This principle was endorsed in unequivocal terms by The House of

Killing an innocent life to save one’s own is no justification to murder even if it is under extreme necessity of hunger. : Queen’s Bench Division

In the case of R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273, DC, Lord Coleridge, Justice Grove, Justice Denman, Lord Pollock and Lord Huddleston se

The Court Of Exchequer Chamber On The Rule Of Strict Liability

Rylands vs Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330 was a decision by the House of Lords which established a new area of English tort law. In this case the

Blogs And Articles