Availing Banking service comes under Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court
Person availing banking service being ‘consumer’ under Consumer Protection Act was upheld by the Supreme Court through the learned bench led by
The rectified spirit’s manufacture and sale by the present appellant is not a liquor to claim an exemption under Entry 47 of Schedule – I or Entry 6 Part – III-A of Schedule – II of the VAT Act. The MPCTAB has also held that in common parlance meaning of Indian Made Foreign Liquor means the liquor which is being sold from the shop having a license for human consumption which does not include the rectified spirit, therefore, it is not exempted from Entry 47 of Schedule – I or Entry 6 Part – III-A of Schedule – II of the VAT Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The present Value Added Tax Appeal stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LIMITED V.
If the plaintiff has no knowledge, as to who is the actual owner prior and after 15th August, 1947 the year 1947 to onward, then the plaintiff cannot take a plea that his adverse possession was openly hostile to the actual owner of the suit property: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The appeal fails and is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BAPULAL V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH COLLECTOR
The provision of Section 16(4) is procedural in nature, and respondents should not take away the right of filing of return with a late fee. There should be a scope of application of mind and consideration of non-filing of return within time while applying Section 16(4) of the CGST Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The writ petition stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S R.K. MODI AND SONS V. UNION OF INDIA through HON
The report is completely silent about the status of the seal put by W&M Department, therefore, DRP has rightly found that it is a case of ‘Major Irregularity’ and punishment should be awarded treating alleged irregularity as ‘Major Irregularity’: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The writ petition is disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S GAGAN AUTOMOBILES V. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. thro
Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4) of Section 13: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The writ petition is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BANK OF BARODA DEWAS BRANCH V. RAJENDRA SONI through HON
In the present case, even if the petitioner was found absent from duty for which she has submitted an explanation with necessary documents, then enquiry ought to have been conducted. If after enquiry the charges are found proved, then only the punishment order ought to have been passed: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The writ appeal is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH V. SMT. NIRMALA RAWAT through HONR
No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings is upheld by the Kerala High Court in the case of M.P. Cho
Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law: Kerala High Court
Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law is upheld by the Kera
The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for dismissing the criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for d
