It has been reaffirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court that the mere issuing of notice on a petition does not impose a ‘binding precedent
In the case of Bolton v. Stone [1951] AC 850, a landmark judgement on tort of negligence was delivered by the House of Lords. It established that
In the case of Royal British Bank v Turquand (1856) 6 E&B 327, popularly known as The Turquand’s case by Sir John Jervis CJ of the Court of
The Karnataka High Court dismissed public interest litigation filed by Divya Rajesh Hagaragi, a prime accused in the Police Sub-Inspector Recruitme
The Karnataka High Court has said that criminal law cannot be set into motion for recovery of money paid under a contract unless the offence of che
The case of Harvey vs Facey ([1893] AC 552), is an important case law in contract law as it defines the difference between an invitation to offer
In the case of Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1030, constitutional implications for common law jurisdictions overpowered across the globe. Itâ
The Bombay High Court has held that the limitation period would start only after the affixing of signatures on the GST registration cancellation
The Karnataka High Court has reiterated that an accused would become entitled to all copies of the chargesheet material, denial of which would resu
Rishikesh Ankita Bhandari was allegedly murdered by Pulkit Arya, the resort’s owner and the son of expelled BJP lawmaker Vinod Arya, and two
We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.
Prime Legal, 4 No Fairle Place, H
MP House 5TH Floor Room No :501, PIN:700001