Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“Country’s Prestige Involved”: Orissa High Court orders the centre to make all necessary arrangements for the participation of the women’s U-18 volleyball team at the Asian Games.
“Country’s Prestige Involved”: Orissa High Court orders the centre to make all necessary arrangements for the participation of the women’s U-18 volleyball team at the Asian Games.
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the case of Lasyamayee Mohanta v. Union of India & Ors.( Case No.: W.P.(C) No. 11906 of 2022, Order Dated- 19th May 2022, Coram- Justice Bis

Orissa High Court Directs the Government to Improve Statewide Public Healthcare Facilities
Orissa High Court Directs the Government to Improve Statewide Public Healthcare Facilities
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the case of Chittaranjan Mohanty v. State of Odisha & Ors.( Case No.: W.P.(C) No. 6109 of 2018, Order Dated- 21st May 2022, Coram: Chief Jus

Civil court shall not grant injunction in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any order : high court of Calcutta
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Civil court shall not grant injunction in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any order  : high court of Calcutta It is the

A partition of a property can be only among those having a share or interest in it : high court of Calcutta
A partition of a property can be only among those having a share or interest in it : high court of Calcutta
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Click here to view the judgement   A partition of a property can be only among those having a share or interest in it. A person who does not have

August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

A partition of a property can be only among those having a share or interest in it : high court of Calcutta   A partition of a property can be onl

This Court is required to test the evidence produced by the prosecution on the anvil of aforesaid dictum of the Supreme Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The appeal filed by the appellant is partly allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of PHIROZ V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Under Section 5 of the Adhiniyam of 1990, the order is liable to be passed if the movement or act of any person is causing or may cause danger to a person or property: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Under Section 5 of the Adhiniyam of 1990, the order is liable to be passed if the movement or act of any person is causing or may cause danger to a person or property: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This appeal stands partly allowed and disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH V. RAJU @ PU

The order in fact was not passed and the respondents were not made parties therein hence the same has rightly been set aside by the Additional Commissioner: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The order in fact was not passed and the respondents were not made parties therein hence the same has rightly been set aside by the Additional Commissioner: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The petition is allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BHANWARLAL V. TOOFAN SINGH through HON’BLE JUSTICE PRANAY VE

Doctor denied bail and found guilty of cruel treatment of wife and demanding money within seven months of their marriage: Kerala High Court
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Doctor denied bail and found guilty of cruel treatment of wife and demanding money within seven months of their marriage by the Kerala High Court i

Just because marital rape is not recognised as a crime under criminal law does not prevent the court from recognising it as a form of cruelty and granting a divorce: Kerala High Court
Just because marital rape is not recognised as a crime under criminal law does not prevent the court from recognising it as a form of cruelty and granting a divorce: Kerala High Court
August 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Just because marital rape is not recognised as a crime under criminal law does not prevent the court from recognising it as a form of cruelty and g