Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The petition seeking equal status to atleast 30% women advocates seeking conferment of Senior Advocate dismissed by Madras High Court
The petition seeking equal status to atleast 30% women advocates seeking conferment of Senior Advocate dismissed by Madras High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

Madras High Court In this case writ petition was filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give equal status to atleast 3

Interim injunction was granted to Viacom-18 by Madras High Court
Interim injunction was granted to Viacom-18 by Madras High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

Madras High Court In this case Viacom 18 had approached the court seeking injunction against Internet Service Provider (ISP) for broadcasting the e

Writ petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI ACT: Rajasthan High Court 
Writ petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI ACT: Rajasthan High Court 
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

Writ petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI ACT: Rajasthan High Court  The High

Exercising judicial discretion as well as invoking the sense for exercising judicial discretion lies with the court; Rejects bail: Rajasthan High court  
Exercising judicial discretion as well as invoking the sense for exercising judicial discretion lies with the court; Rejects bail: Rajasthan High court  
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

Exercising judicial discretion as well as invoking the sense for exercising judicial discretion lies with the court; Rejects bail: Rajasthan High c

Whether, the claim of the Union regarding 40 workers as per list enclosed should be treated as regular workers of Paradip Port Trust and paid regular wages at par with the similar worker of Paradip Port Trust Management. If so, to what relief the workers are entitled and from which date? – Odisha High Court
Whether, the claim of the Union regarding 40 workers as per list enclosed should be treated as regular workers of Paradip Port Trust and paid regular wages at par with the similar worker of Paradip Port Trust Management. If so, to what relief the workers are entitled and from which date? – Odisha High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team

On 31st August 2007 the Odisha High Court passed a Judgement relating to the case of Paradip Post Trust and General Secretary. And the Judgement wa

The car, came from the opposite direction and dashed against the rickshaw. As a result of the accident, the claimant received serious injuries over several parts of his body and remained as an indoor patient at Sakhigopal Hospital. It was found that his left leg and the right collar bone were fractured. He alleged that he became invalid and members of his family have been deprived of his earnings as a rickshaw puller. Claim of Rs. 22,000/- as compensation was laid before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Puri. – Odisha High Court.
The car, came from the opposite direction and dashed against the rickshaw. As a result of the accident, the claimant received serious injuries over several parts of his body and remained as an indoor patient at Sakhigopal Hospital. It was found that his left leg and the right collar bone were fractured. He alleged that he became invalid and members of his family have been deprived of his earnings as a rickshaw puller. Claim of Rs. 22,000/- as compensation was laid before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Puri. – Odisha High Court.
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team

On 30th April 1976, the Odisha High Court passed a judgement in relation to Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and The Insurance Act, 1938. This Judgement wa

The direction of removal of encroachment is without prejudice to rival claims to ownership of graveyards: Delhi High Court
The direction of removal of encroachment is without prejudice to rival claims to ownership of graveyards: Delhi High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team

W.P.(C) 17520/2022 & CM APPL. 55902/2022 MOHD ISREAL AND ORS vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.                   The current wr

The object of ingrafting section 341 in the Cr.P.C. is to provide an opportunity for the High Court to go through the record of the trial court so as to ascertain whether the accused under disability of not understanding the proceedings has been given a fair trial. However, in no case, the trial can be quashed.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 19th of December, 2022 in which the high court dismissed the appeal and upheld th

The provisions of the J&K State Consumer Protection Act, 1987 show that the Commission does not have any power at all to restore the complaint dismissed for non-prosecution.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 22nd of December 2022 in which the high court accepted the petition and allowed i

The applicant is 70 years old and it is not alleged that there is any likelihood of him, absconding during the trial or that he will tamper with the evidence: Delhi High Court
The applicant is 70 years old and it is not alleged that there is any likelihood of him, absconding during the trial or that he will tamper with the evidence: Delhi High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team

BAIL APPLN. 3344/2022 TIKA RAM KHARE vs STATE OF NCT DELHI The regular bail application is filed as per section 439 (Special powers of High Court o