Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Court refuses anticipatory bail to the project advisor in the Lucknow Gomti River Front “Scam”: Allahabad High Court
Court refuses anticipatory bail to the project advisor in the Lucknow Gomti River Front “Scam”: Allahabad High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case title – Badri Shrestha v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and another [Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 CR

CONTINUE READING
Trial Court required to prima-facie ascertain the relevancy of the proposed witnesses while deciding application under Order XVI R 1 and 2 CPC: Rajasthan High Court 
Trial Court required to prima-facie ascertain the relevancy of the proposed witnesses while deciding application under Order XVI R 1 and 2 CPC: Rajasthan High Court 
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Trial Court required to prima-facie ascertain the relevancy of the proposed witnesses while deciding application under Order XVI R 1 and 2 CPC: Raj

CONTINUE READING
Alleged illegal termination from Kotak Mahindra Bank pending for relief due to vacancy of competent authority; State appoints Deputy Labour Commissioner:  Rajasthan High Court 
Alleged illegal termination from Kotak Mahindra Bank pending for relief due to vacancy of competent authority; State appoints Deputy Labour Commissioner:  Rajasthan High Court 
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Alleged illegal termination from Kotak Mahindra Bank pending for relief due to vacancy of competent authority; State appoints Deputy Labor Commissi

CONTINUE READING
The order of bail in anticipation of arrest cannot be granted for it to be used as a shield: Delhi High Court
The order of bail in anticipation of arrest cannot be granted for it to be used as a shield: Delhi High Court
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

BAIL APPLN. 3077/2022 Ashwani Kumar vs State The present application of bail is filed under section 438 of Cr.P.C for grant of pre-arrest bail in F

CONTINUE READING
The questions i.e., as to whether the accused had the knowledge of the notice of demand in case of cheque bouncing and whether he deliberately avoided the service of the notice, can only be answered after the trial of the case. At the stage of summoning the accused, these questions could not have been determined by the learned trial Magistrate and these questions cannot be determined by this Court in these proceedings by holding a mini-trial.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 30th of December, 2022 in which the high court dismissed the petition on the basi

CONTINUE READING
The failure of the detaining authority to supply the material relied on at the time of making the detention order to the detenu renders the detention order illegal and unsustainable.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 30th of December, 2022 in which the High Court disposed of the petition and the d

CONTINUE READING
Statements of the petitioners recorded under Section 164, Cr. P.C., since not relied upon by the prosecution, if of no consequence to grant any benefit from that to any of the accused persons. This fact if necessary, may be brought to the notice of the trial Court at the time of trial of the murder case.– Odisha High Court.
Statements of the petitioners recorded under Section 164, Cr. P.C., since not relied upon by the prosecution, if of no consequence to grant any benefit from that to any of the accused persons. This fact if necessary, may be brought to the notice of the trial Court at the time of trial of the murder case.– Odisha High Court.
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

On 27th January 1999, The Odisha High Court passed a judgement in relation to Jogendra Nahak And Ors. vs State Of Orissa And Ors.  (1999) 16 OCR 2

CONTINUE READING
The differences in the impugned design vis-à-vis the suit design are sufficient to defeat the allegation of piracy: Delhi High Court
The differences in the impugned design vis-à-vis the suit design are sufficient to defeat the allegation of piracy: Delhi High Court
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

I.A. 725/2022 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC). Judgement pronounced on 19th December 2022 by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR.

CONTINUE READING
Interest charged on tax refund payable on expiry of 3 months from the date of refund application: Karnataka HC
Interest charged on tax refund payable on expiry of 3 months from the date of refund application: Karnataka HC
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka HC on 10.11.22 passed a judgement under Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar in AI Tisource Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissi

CONTINUE READING
It’s incorrect for the police to presume that every society or club will indulge in Unlawful Activities: Karnataka High Court
It’s incorrect for the police to presume that every society or club will indulge in Unlawful Activities: Karnataka High Court
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court under Justice K S Hemalekha in SRI Siragalli Lakshmidevi Recreation Club v. State of Karnataka (Writ Petition no. 22854/20

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.