Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Exercising judicial discretion as well as invoking the sense for exercising judicial discretion lies with the court; Rejects bail: Rajasthan High court  
Exercising judicial discretion as well as invoking the sense for exercising judicial discretion lies with the court; Rejects bail: Rajasthan High court  
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Exercising judicial discretion as well as invoking the sense for exercising judicial discretion lies with the court; Rejects bail: Rajasthan High c

Whether, the claim of the Union regarding 40 workers as per list enclosed should be treated as regular workers of Paradip Port Trust and paid regular wages at par with the similar worker of Paradip Port Trust Management. If so, to what relief the workers are entitled and from which date? – Odisha High Court
Whether, the claim of the Union regarding 40 workers as per list enclosed should be treated as regular workers of Paradip Port Trust and paid regular wages at par with the similar worker of Paradip Port Trust Management. If so, to what relief the workers are entitled and from which date? – Odisha High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

On 31st August 2007 the Odisha High Court passed a Judgement relating to the case of Paradip Post Trust and General Secretary. And the Judgement wa

The car, came from the opposite direction and dashed against the rickshaw. As a result of the accident, the claimant received serious injuries over several parts of his body and remained as an indoor patient at Sakhigopal Hospital. It was found that his left leg and the right collar bone were fractured. He alleged that he became invalid and members of his family have been deprived of his earnings as a rickshaw puller. Claim of Rs. 22,000/- as compensation was laid before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Puri. – Odisha High Court.
The car, came from the opposite direction and dashed against the rickshaw. As a result of the accident, the claimant received serious injuries over several parts of his body and remained as an indoor patient at Sakhigopal Hospital. It was found that his left leg and the right collar bone were fractured. He alleged that he became invalid and members of his family have been deprived of his earnings as a rickshaw puller. Claim of Rs. 22,000/- as compensation was laid before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Puri. – Odisha High Court.
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

On 30th April 1976, the Odisha High Court passed a judgement in relation to Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and The Insurance Act, 1938. This Judgement wa

The direction of removal of encroachment is without prejudice to rival claims to ownership of graveyards: Delhi High Court
The direction of removal of encroachment is without prejudice to rival claims to ownership of graveyards: Delhi High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

W.P.(C) 17520/2022 & CM APPL. 55902/2022 MOHD ISREAL AND ORS vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.                   The current wr

The object of ingrafting section 341 in the Cr.P.C. is to provide an opportunity for the High Court to go through the record of the trial court so as to ascertain whether the accused under disability of not understanding the proceedings has been given a fair trial. However, in no case, the trial can be quashed.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 19th of December, 2022 in which the high court dismissed the appeal and upheld th

The provisions of the J&K State Consumer Protection Act, 1987 show that the Commission does not have any power at all to restore the complaint dismissed for non-prosecution.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 22nd of December 2022 in which the high court accepted the petition and allowed i

The applicant is 70 years old and it is not alleged that there is any likelihood of him, absconding during the trial or that he will tamper with the evidence: Delhi High Court
The applicant is 70 years old and it is not alleged that there is any likelihood of him, absconding during the trial or that he will tamper with the evidence: Delhi High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

BAIL APPLN. 3344/2022 TIKA RAM KHARE vs STATE OF NCT DELHI The regular bail application is filed as per section 439 (Special powers of High Court o

Cannot Reject Passport Applications Based On Reports Of Non-Cognizable Cases That haven’t been Investigated: Allahabad High Court
Cannot Reject Passport Applications Based On Reports Of Non-Cognizable Cases That haven’t been Investigated: Allahabad High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case title – Basoo Yadav vs. Union Of India And 4 Others [WRIT – C No. – 29605 of 2022] The Allahabad High Court has observed tha

The State of Tamil Nadu Government was directed by Madras High Court to pay Rs. 1 lakh as compensation to the family of the bangle seller as he went missing after his hospitalization during Covid-19 in 2020
The State of Tamil Nadu Government was directed by Madras High Court to pay Rs. 1 lakh as compensation to the family of the bangle seller as he went missing after his hospitalization during Covid-19 in 2020
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Madras High Court The petition was of Habeas corpus. In this case the petitioner father who was bangle seller who went missing during Covid-19 2020

AIADMK Minister M. Manikandan was arrested from Bengluru by Chennai city Police After his anticipatory bail got rejected by Madras High Court.
AIADMK Minister M. Manikandan was arrested from Bengluru by Chennai city Police After his anticipatory bail got rejected by Madras High Court.
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Madras High Court In this case AIADMK minister got arrested after the complaint got filed against him by a Malaysian Women to whom the minister had