Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
In my humble opinion, the victim girl is entitled to compensation and considering the facts and circumstances I award a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- to be given to the victim within one month from this day: Calcutta High Court
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Digantan Mukherjee v. Raju Roy and Anr, CRA 512 of 2018 before the Honoura

There cannot be any set of rules or guidelines, which may apply in all cases, under all the circumstances for evaluation of evidence. Evaluation of evidence is a matter, which differs with case to case and even in some cases, it differs from witness to witness: The Uttarakhand high court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on 11th January 2019 in the case Rajesh v. state of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2015).

There cannot be a revival of an abated proceeding, which had been abated by operation of law, by giving a judicial verdict to revive abated proceedings, before the Settlement Commission: The high court of Uttarakhand
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on 19th april 2022 in the case of M/S Doon Defence Academy and others v. The Central Board of Indi

The point of maintainability, as raised by Mr. Majumdar, is kept open to be decided at the time of final hearing of the present application: Calcutta High Court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Subhra Mukhyapadhya and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. IA NO: GA/1/2022In WPO/187/2

Where two views are possible and the assessing officer has taken one view with which the CIT does not agree, it cannot be treated as an erroneous order, unless the view taken by the assessing officer is unsustainable under law.: Calcutta High Court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Principal Commissioner v. M/S Britianna Industries Limited of Income Tax 1

We cannot overlook the important fact that the Special Officer has expressed his intention nor to continue in such capacity which we appreciate in view of the unsavoury expressions having been used against him though later on withdrawn and, therefore, the said Special Officer is hereby discharged: Calcutta High Court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Kapilsehwar Singh v. Maharani Adhirani Kamasundari and Ors. APO No. 35 of 2021 With

I find no merit in the argument of the respondent that the proceeding before the National Company Law Tribunal is a bar to the arbitration process: Calcutta High Court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case Uphealth Holdings Inc v. Glocal Healthcare Systems Pvt. Ltd. AP/809/2022 befo

Doctor’s Consultation Room Not A ‘Public Place’: Kerala High Court Quashes Case Against Paediatrician
December 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

On Tuesday, the Kerala High Court quashed a case of harassment against a doctor because it determined that the doctor’s hospital consulting r

High Court Upholds Grant Of Maintenance To Wife Who Voluntarily Left Husband, Failed To Prove Cruelty Charge Against Him: KERELA HIGH COURT
High Court Upholds Grant Of Maintenance To Wife Who Voluntarily Left Husband, Failed To Prove Cruelty Charge Against Him: KERELA HIGH COURT
December 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In a recent ruling, the Kerala High Court stated that a wife’s inability to lead a peaceful life in the matrimonial home may not always const

This Court would not also examine the genuineness of the allegations since this Court does not function as a Court of Appeal or Revision, while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India: the Uttarakhand high court
December 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 07th April 2022 in the case Sheetal Kaur v. state of Uttarakhand and others (CRIMINAL WRIT PETITIO