JURY TRIALS: AN ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION Jury Trials are something that has always managed to make me curious. Post the Nanavati Case, India completely took off the concept of
Filing of FIR in India
If you are a tourist or expatriate living outside India, there is a good chance that you have never had to file a criminal complaint in India, let
PUNISHMENT FOR OFFENCES IN INDIA
Introduction The concept of punishment, its explanation, and its concrete request and reasoning during the past half-century have presented a clear
TASILDAR WHO ACCEPTED BRIBE RELEASED ON BAIL BY HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
In the matter of Sri. Purandara Hegde vs The State on 22 November, 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10279/2022 A/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10355/2022) presid
TRIBUNAL AWARDS LESS TO THE DAUGHTER OF THE DECEASED THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA INTERFERES BY AWARDING MORE
In the matter of Siddalakshmamma vs Managing Director on 22 November, 2022(M.F.A.NO.6298/2017 (MV-D)) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P
The courts evolved a jurisprudence of compassion. Procedural propriety was to move over giving place to substantive concerns of the deprivation of rights: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court opined the above in the case of Anindya Sundar Das vs State Of West Bengal And Ors, WPA (P) 588 of 2022 which was presided
The issue of title and entitlement of the appellant to have possession of the entire 1st floor of the premises is a factual dispute for which the appellant is required to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court opined the above-mentioned in the case of Arun Kumar Sadhu vs The State Of West Bengal And Ors, MAT 1365 of 2022 With CAN 1
THE COMMISSIONER HAS COMMITTED AN ERROR IN FIXING THE LIABILITY ON THE INSURED INSTEAD OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY: SAYS KARNATAKA HC
In the matter of Shivanna @ Shivamurthy vs G M Thippeswamy on 22 November, 2022( M.F.A.NO.2911/2017 (WC)) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
TRIBUNAL AWARDS LESS DAMAGES, THE KARNATAKA HC GIVES JUSTICE BY AWARDING MORE
In the matter of Kumaraswamy vs The Executive Engineer (Elec) on 22 November, 2022(M.F.A.NO.3585/2017 (MV–I)) presided by THE HON’BLE M
IN VIEW OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF KISHAN GOPAL (SUPRA), THE VERY CONTENTION OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT INTEREST HAS TO BE REDUCED TO 6% CANNOT BE ACCEPTED AND HENCE THE INTEREST IS AWARDED AT THE RATE OF 9% PER ANNUM SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
In the matter of Regional Manager vs Geetha on 22 November, 2022 presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH state thatThis m.F.A is off
