Plea To Quash S.138 NI Act Conviction Not Maintainable U/S 482 CrPC: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court passed a judgement on 20th February, 2023 petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking to quas
Retired Freedom Fighter of 102 yrs Gets Arrears of Pension After The Interposition of Karnataka High Court.
The Karnataka High Court on 20th February, in H.Nagabhushana Rao V. The Under Secretary FFR Division & Others (WRIT PETITION No.405
Bail granted by court on fabrication of ₹367 crores as evidence collected is documentary: Punjab High Court.
The Punjab High Court on 16th February, 2023, in Vijay Garg v/s State of Haryana and another (CRM-M-14003-2022), passed an order of bail stating th
In our opinion, this withholding of payment of the deposit amount to the complainants even after the date of maturity is clearly deficiency in service: SCDRC – Karnataka
Sumangal Rao & another v. Vijaya Bank, CPR (1) 163 (SCDRC – Karnataka) 1995 1 CPR 163 Here, the complainants sought for payment of deposi
Location/GPS to be kept ‘ON’ as bail condition: Punjab High Court.
The Punjab High Court on 8th February, 2023, in Hussain Abbas Alias Tippu v/s State of Haryana (CRM-M-1210-2023), held several bail conditions for
Supreme Court upholds Madras High Court order paving way for election of E Palaniswami as AIADMK head : SC
The Supreme court passed a judgement on 23rd February, 2023 This was seen in the case of Thiru K Palaniswamy vs M Shanmugam civil appeal no. 1392
Deadline to file rejoinder to reply under Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules not mandatory: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court passed a judgement on 16th February, 2023. This was seen in the case of Vinay Kumar GB v. Sudhir Kumar and anr. 2023/DHC/00116
For the purpose of an application under Order VII Rule(s) 10 and 11 CPC, the averments made in the plaint are required to be considered as correct: Delhi High Court
FAO (COMM) 43/2023 SONAL KANODIA v. SHRI RAM GUPTA & ANR. The current appeal was filed challenging the order of 17th December, 2022 passed by t
The CIC was right in observing that as against the Rs.10/- which was to be paid by the RTI Applicant/ Respondent, the notices sent by the NGT would have incurred more expenditure: Delhi High Court
W.P.(C) 7611/2015 and CM APPL. 14775/2015 NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL v. ALOK KUMAR GHOSH The current petition was filed by the Petitioner, National Gr
Supreme Court’s Reputation “SkyHigh,” Can’t Be Ruined By Individuals’ Statements: Bombay High Court on Throwing Out PIL Against Vice President & Law Minister
The Honourable Supreme Court of India enjoys an extremely high reputation. The Bombay High Court stated in a comprehensive decision dismissing the
