Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
DLSA to pay compensation to rape victim under repealed 2013 scheme: Punjab High Court.
DLSA to pay compensation to rape victim under repealed 2013 scheme: Punjab High Court.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Punjab High Court, on 2nd February, 2023, in ABC v/s State of Haryana and others (CWP-16867-2022 (O&M), directed compensation to the victim

Karnataka High Court Holds That POCSO Act Should Not Be An Excuse To Not Grant The Accused An Opportunity Of Cross Examination.
Karnataka High Court Holds That POCSO Act Should Not Be An Excuse To Not Grant The Accused An Opportunity Of Cross Examination.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 13th February, 2023 set aside an order passed by the Special Court which rejected the application

Under Domestic Violence Act Court Can Order Husband To Pay Wife Monetary Expenses In Lieu Of Shared House: Karnataka High Court
Under Domestic Violence Act Court Can Order Husband To Pay Wife Monetary Expenses In Lieu Of Shared House: Karnataka High Court
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 7th February, 2023 modified an order passed by the Trial court which directed a woman be paid Rs.

The offence of rape can be permitted to be compounded to promote of family life of complainant and accused: Andhra Pradesh High Court
The offence of rape can be permitted to be compounded to promote of family life of complainant and accused: Andhra Pradesh High Court
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Andhra Pradesh High Court issued an order on 4th January, 2023 in which it held that the offence under sec 376 of IPC can be compounded to prom

Waman Rao and others vs. UOI: Court held that in the 1981 case of Waman Rao v. Union of India, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Articles 31A and 31B of the Indian Constitution in light of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment’s introduction of the fundamental structure theory. Court: Supreme Court of India. (1981) 2 SCC 362, 1981 2 SCR 1.
Waman Rao and others vs. UOI: Court held that in the 1981 case of Waman Rao v. Union of India, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Articles 31A and 31B of the Indian Constitution in light of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment’s introduction of the fundamental structure theory. Court: Supreme Court of India. (1981) 2 SCC 362, 1981 2 SCR 1.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: The Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Act, 1962 (the Act) which put a ceiling upon the agricultural lands was updated and the ceili

The Criminal Procedure Code’s Section 125(1) deals with the topic of “Who Can Claim Maintenance?” Mohd. Ahmed Khan VS Shah Bano Begum & Ors. Supreme Court of India, Bench: DY CHANDRACHUD – CJI. 1985 AIR 945, 1985 SCR (3) 844.
The Criminal Procedure Code’s Section 125(1) deals with the topic of “Who Can Claim Maintenance?” Mohd. Ahmed Khan VS Shah Bano Begum & Ors. Supreme Court of India, Bench: DY CHANDRACHUD – CJI. 1985 AIR 945, 1985 SCR (3) 844.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: Three boys and two daughters were born to Mohd Ahmed Khan (the appealing party), a lawyer by profession, and Shah Bano Begum (th

Mere Write Off Is Sufficient for Claiming Deduction of Bad Debt: The Supreme Court
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Supreme Court in the case of T. R. F. Ltd. v. CIT (2010) 323 ITR 397/190 Taxman 391/35 DTR 156/(2011) 220 Taxation 88 (SC) held that as per S.

NO QUARRYING COULD HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN IN THE PROPERTY FOR THE BASIC REASON THAT THE AREA WHEREIN THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS SITUATED, IS A RED ZONE AREA IN THE ZONATION MAP: KERALA HIGH COURT
NO QUARRYING COULD HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN IN THE PROPERTY FOR THE BASIC REASON THAT THE AREA WHEREIN THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS SITUATED, IS A RED ZONE AREA IN THE ZONATION MAP: KERALA HIGH COURT
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on  17 January, 2023which stated that no quarrying could have been undertaken in the property for the

IT IS FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO PAY THE STATUTORY INTEREST TO THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN AGITATING FOR THE AMOUNTS DUE TO THEM OPT AND THEN TO RECOVER IT FROM THE C-STED, IF SO ADVISED: KERALA HIGH COURT
IT IS FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO PAY THE STATUTORY INTEREST TO THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN AGITATING FOR THE AMOUNTS DUE TO THEM OPT AND THEN TO RECOVER IT FROM THE C-STED, IF SO ADVISED: KERALA HIGH COURT
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on   19 January, 2023 which stated that it is for the government to pay the statutory interest to tho

Karnataka High Court Directs Police To Register Visually Challenged Person’s Complaint Under PwD Act Instead Of Consigning Him To Common Law Remedy.
Karnataka High Court Directs Police To Register Visually Challenged Person’s Complaint Under PwD Act Instead Of Consigning Him To Common Law Remedy.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 16th February, 2023 held  that a disabled person raising a complaint under provisions of the Rig