Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Juvenile to be tried as an adult in murder case: Punjab High Court.
Juvenile to be tried as an adult in murder case: Punjab High Court.
May 11, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, in Bholu, ‘a juvenile in conflict with law’ v/s Central Bureau of Investigation(CRR-452-2023), delivered on 3rd May 2023

Continuance of a citizen in custody without there being a mandate of law i.e. illegal custody cannot be permitted: Punjab High Court.
Continuance of a citizen in custody without there being a mandate of law i.e. illegal custody cannot be permitted: Punjab High Court.
May 11, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, in Bhawana Gupta and others v/s State of Punjab (CRM-M-23437-2023), held that continuance of a citizen in custody without th

Order quashed on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice: Punjab High Court.
Order quashed on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice: Punjab High Court.
May 11, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, in Arihant Roller Flour Mills v/s National Faceless Assessment Centre and anr (CWP-7239-2), delivered on 26th May, 2023, hel

WHEN A NOTICE IS ISSUED WITH PRE-MEDITATION, A WRIT PETITION WOULD BE MAINTAINABLE.: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
WHEN A NOTICE IS ISSUED WITH PRE-MEDITATION, A WRIT PETITION WOULD BE MAINTAINABLE.: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
May 11, 2023by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on  25.04.2023  stating that when a notice is issued with pre-meditation, a writ petition would be

NO PERSON CAN BE DEPRIVED OF HIS/HER PROPERTY SAVE BY AUTHORITY OF LAW AND DEPRIVING THE PETITIONERS OF THE PROPERTY WITHOUT FOLLOWING DUE PROCESS OF WOULD BE IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 300-A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PROPERTY: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
NO PERSON CAN BE DEPRIVED OF HIS/HER PROPERTY SAVE BY AUTHORITY OF LAW AND DEPRIVING THE PETITIONERS OF THE PROPERTY WITHOUT FOLLOWING DUE PROCESS OF WOULD BE IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 300-A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PROPERTY: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
May 11, 2023by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on 25.04.2023 stating that no person can be deprived of his/her property save by authority of law and

School on Panchayat land allowed on ground of meaning use of panchayat land: Punjab High Court.
School on Panchayat land allowed on ground of meaning use of panchayat land: Punjab High Court.
May 10, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, in BAAS Educational Trust, GBP School v/s State of Haryana and others (CWP-12593-2015), on 11th April, 2023, held that runni

Writ Petition Challenges Road Shows Conducted by Political Parties in Karnataka
Writ Petition Challenges Road Shows Conducted by Political Parties in Karnataka
May 10, 2023by Primelegal Team

  Sri. Amruthesh N P vs State Of Karnataka 5 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble Krishna S Dixit, Hon’ble Vijaykumar A. Patil   Introduction: A recent w

Tax deposited during search not voluntary, to be returned with 6% simple interest: Punjab High Court.
Tax deposited during search not voluntary, to be returned with 6% simple interest: Punjab High Court.
May 10, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, in Modern Insecticides Limited and another v/s Commissioner, Central Good and Service Tax and another (CWP No.8035 of 2021),

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Vehicle Theft Case
Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Vehicle Theft Case
May 10, 2023by Primelegal Team

Kallappa  Muduku S/O Ashok  vs The State Of Karnataka 9 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble Ramachandra D. Huddar   Introduction: In a recent ruling, the

TO HOLD A PERSON AS A CO-CONSPIRATOR SUCH PERSON SHOULD HAVE CO-OPERATED FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE OBJECT BY EFFECTIVE MEANS: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
TO HOLD A PERSON AS A CO-CONSPIRATOR SUCH PERSON SHOULD HAVE CO-OPERATED FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE OBJECT BY EFFECTIVE MEANS: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
May 10, 2023by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on 28th April 2023,  stating that to hold a person as a co-conspirator such person should have co-op