Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Mosquito Repellent ‘Good Knight’ Is An Insecticide, 4% VAT Applicable: Orissa High Court
Mosquito Repellent ‘Good Knight’ Is An Insecticide, 4% VAT Applicable: Orissa High Court
March 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: The high court bench of Orissa comprising Chief Justice S. Muralidhar and Justice M.S. Raman has upheld the tribunal’s ord

ANIMAL CRUELTY vis-à-vis ANIMAL RAPE : IN INDIA
ANIMAL CRUELTY vis-à-vis ANIMAL RAPE : IN INDIA
March 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

“The idea of Humanity is no longer confined to man; it is beginning to extend itself to the lower animals, as in the past it has been gradually e

327 ITR 456/193" headline="" subheadline="<span class="btArticleDate">March 24, 2023</span><span class="btArticleAuthor"><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/author/anik/" class="btArticleAuthorURL">by Primelegal Team</a></span><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/case-summary-ge-india-technology-cen-p-ltd-v-cit-2010-327-itr-456-193/#comments" class="btArticleComments">0</a>" font="" font_weight="" font_size="" color_scheme="" color="" align="" url="https://blog.primelegal.in/case-summary-ge-india-technology-cen-p-ltd-v-cit-2010-327-itr-456-193/" target="_self" html_tag="h2" size="normal" dash="" el_id="" el_class="" el_style="" supertitle_position="outside" ignore_fe_editor="true"]

Facts The Supreme Court took into consideration the facts presented in the lead suit, which was called Sonata Information Technology Ltd. The respo

Anti-Defection Law Landmark Cases:
Anti-Defection Law Landmark Cases:
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

2019 v. Hon. Speaker, Karnataka Legislative Assembly, Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil In this relatively recent decision, the petitioners contested the S

Timeline of Cases on Doctrine of Severability:
Timeline of Cases on Doctrine of Severability:
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

State of Bombay v. FN Balsara The Bombay Prohibition Act of 1949’s scope and whether alcohol-infused medications and toiletries fall under it

R.M.D.C v. the State of Bombay
R.M.D.C v. the State of Bombay
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

A case’s facts The Prize Competitions Act (42 of 955), Sections 4 and 5, and Regulation 11 and 12 created under Section 20 of the Act were al

Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535
AC 535" headline="" subheadline="<span class="btArticleDate">March 24, 2023</span><span class="btArticleAuthor"><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/author/anik/" class="btArticleAuthorURL">by Primelegal Team</a></span><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/nordenfelt-v-maxim-nordenfelt-guns-and-ammunition-co-ltd-1894-ac-535/#comments" class="btArticleComments">0</a>" font="" font_weight="" font_size="" color_scheme="" color="" align="" url="https://blog.primelegal.in/nordenfelt-v-maxim-nordenfelt-guns-and-ammunition-co-ltd-1894-ac-535/" target="_self" html_tag="h2" size="normal" dash="" el_id="" el_class="" el_style="" supertitle_position="outside" ignore_fe_editor="true"]

Facts Swedish gun manufacturer Thorsten Nordenfelt, the appellant, operated a significant, global business. He agreed to engage into a restrictive

3-year-old child cannot be expected to describe private parts: Bombay High Court upholds POCSO conviction
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court passed a order on 13 March, 2023.This was seen in the case of Mahadev Gaur Bishwas  v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr 44

Doctrine of Severability
Doctrine of Severability
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Section III, or the basic rights, also became operative with the 1950 ratification of the Indian Constitution. A set of inalienable rights known as

Court permits Mumbai resident to publish Marathi translation of ‘The Spirit’s Pilgrimage’ authored by Gandhi’s disciple Mirabehn : Bombay High Court
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court passed a order on 21 March, 2023.This was seen in the case of. Anil G Karkhanis v. Kirloskar Press 1 of 2022 and the case was