Facts of the Case: The high court bench of Orissa comprising Chief Justice S. Muralidhar and Justice M.S. Raman has upheld the tribunal’s ord
Facts of the Case: The high court bench of Orissa comprising Chief Justice S. Muralidhar and Justice M.S. Raman has upheld the tribunal’s ord
“The idea of Humanity is no longer confined to man; it is beginning to extend itself to the lower animals, as in the past it has been gradually e
Facts The Supreme Court took into consideration the facts presented in the lead suit, which was called Sonata Information Technology Ltd. The respo
2019 v. Hon. Speaker, Karnataka Legislative Assembly, Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil In this relatively recent decision, the petitioners contested the S
State of Bombay v. FN Balsara The Bombay Prohibition Act of 1949’s scope and whether alcohol-infused medications and toiletries fall under it
A case’s facts The Prize Competitions Act (42 of 955), Sections 4 and 5, and Regulation 11 and 12 created under Section 20 of the Act were al
Facts Swedish gun manufacturer Thorsten Nordenfelt, the appellant, operated a significant, global business. He agreed to engage into a restrictive
The Bombay High Court passed a order on 13 March, 2023.This was seen in the case of Mahadev Gaur Bishwas v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr 44
Section III, or the basic rights, also became operative with the 1950 ratification of the Indian Constitution. A set of inalienable rights known as
The Bombay High Court passed a order on 21 March, 2023.This was seen in the case of. Anil G Karkhanis v. Kirloskar Press 1 of 2022 and the case was