Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab: ‘Rarest of Rarest Doctine’
This is a landmark case (AIR 1980 SC 898, 1980) decided by a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court consisting of, Justice Y.C. Chandrachud, Justice
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: Sexual Harassment of Women in the Workplace
Vishaka & Ors. v State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241 is a milestone judgment given by the honorable Supreme Court of India that deals with aspe
Bail was granted to four accused involved in allegedly destroying a 400-year-old structure in temple premises: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court passed a judgement on 22nd of December, 2022 granting bail to the four, who were allegedly involved in the demolition of a 40
Father of a 11-month-old child cannot deny the responsibility of paying interim maintenance on the ground that he was denied visitation: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court passed a judgement on 22nd of December, 2022 in which it directed a father of a 11-month-old child to pay interim maintenance
Physical Presence Of Accused Essential For Determining Unsoundness Of Mind Making Him Incapable To Enter Defence: Orissa High Court
FACTS OF THE CASE The high court of Orissa passed a judgment on 11 April 2023, has clarified that physical presence of accused in the Court is esse
Orissa High Court Rightly Regarded As ‘Custodian Of Constitution’
While speaking at a felicitation ceremony for former Chief Justices and Judges of the Orissa High Court as part of its 75th-anniversary celebration
DARCY V. ALLIEN
Edward Darcy Esquire V. Thomas Allien of London Haberdasher was an early landmark case in English law which is also known as Case of Monopolies.
MAKE IT 16 INCORPORATED V. ATTORNEY GENERAL.
In the landmark case of Make it 16 Inc. V. Attorney General in 2022, the Supreme Court of New Zealand declared that setting the age limit as 18 wit
CDR Data Can Only Be Used As Corroborative Piece Of Evidence, Can’t Be Sole Basis For Conviction: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has passed a judgment on 23-03-2023 in the case of Azad @Gaurav vs State of GNCT of Delhi & Another CRL.A. 593/2022. Justi
Appointment Offer Can’t Be Cancelled Merely On Basis Of Previous Involvement In FIR Without Considering Reasoning In Judgment: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has passed a judgment on 11-04-2023 in the case of Mahesh Kumar vs Union Of India W.P.(C) 860/2023. Justice V. Kameshwar Rao a
