IMPACT OF POCSO ACT 2012 ON THE INDIAN SOCIETY: A LEGAL AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION According to the 2011 All India Census, children make up 39% of the population, however many of them are vulnerable to child sexual ab
Addressing the Critical Issue of Prison Overcrowding: A Legal Perspective
Introduction: Prison overcrowding has become a pressing issue in many countries around the world. The steady rise in incarceration rates, coupled w
The purpose of bail is not punitive or preventive; it is primarily intended to ensure the presence of the accused during the trial: Delhi High Court on 2nd June 2023
Facts of the case Malvinder Mohan Singh, the former promoter of Religare Enterprises Limited, has been granted bail by the Delhi High Court. FIR No
Attari Checkpoint Heroin Recovery: Delhi High Court Allows Bail to Trader, Claiming He Was Unaware of Contraband Hidden in Package
Introduction Senior Advocate Siddharth Aggarwal with Advocate Nipun Katyal Chaitanya appeared in the case of Vipin Mittal v NIA on 30th May 2023
Muslims may adopt a kid who has been given up, but they must follow the JJ (Care and Protection of Children) Act’s guidelines: Orissa High Court.
The Orissa high court’s division bench of S. Talapatra* and Savitri Ratho, JJ has adjudicated while exercising the parens patriae jurisdiction fo
There is no exclusion of individuals from welfare programs due to a lack of an Aadhaar card or mobile phone: Orissa High Court
The Orissa high court’s Division Bench of S. Muralidhar (CJ) and G. Satapathy, J adjudicated that failure to possess an Aadhaar Card or a mobile
CHALLENGING A CHANGE IN DATE OF BIRTH AT THE FAG END OF SERVICE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay bench at Aurangabad passed a judgement on 30 May 2023. In the case of GAJANAN B. RABDE VS THE CHIEF ADMINISTR
EQUIVALENCE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION DEGREES: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay bench at Aurangabad passed a judgement on 30 May 2023. In the case of NIHAL ANANDRAO TANDEKAR VS THE NUCLEAR
Until the appellant gives the sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, it cannot be condoned: Gujarat High Court
State Of Gujarat vs Lajbarkhan Sherdalkhan Pathan on 12 April, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1890
A casual remark that is likely to cause harassment in ordinary course of thing, made against the applicants would not fall within the term ‘instigation’: Gujarat High Court
Pravinbhai Jivrambhai Deria vs State Of Gujarat on 23 May, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Ilesh J. Vora R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 11161 of 20
