Not all defamation prosecutions can be quashed solely on withdrawal of allegations: Supreme Court
Title: Tejashwi Prasad Yadav Versus Hareshbhai Pranshankar Mehta TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO. 846 OF 2023 Date of Judgment- February 13, 2024 CORAM
Higher courts are required to follow judicial discipline and comity to uphold the law: Supreme Court.
Case title: Directorate Of Enforcement vs Niraj Tyagi Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 843 Of 2024 Decided on: 13.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Be
Compensation amount increased after insurer failed to prove evidence
Title: ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD V K. SURAMBAYEE Citation: C.M.A.(MD)No.870 of 2012 and MP(MD) No.1 of 2012 Dated on: 9.2.2024 Corum: HON’
Convicts life imprisonment reduced to three years in spite of hitting the victim in a “Lathi” :Allahabad HC
Title: DURGA PRASAD V STATE OF HARYANA Citation: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 651 OF 1989 Dated on: 6.2.2024 Corum: HON’BLE JUSTICE JYOTSNA SHARMA &
Compassionate Grounds : Allahabad High Court’s Verdict on Class-III Appointment Under Rule 5 of the Dying-In-Harness Rules, 1974
TITLE: ARPIT SHUKLA V. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS CITATION: WRIT – A NO. – 19344 OF 2023 DECIDED ON: 30 JANUARY 2024 CORA
Upholding Rights Over Suspicions – Birth Certificate Issuance Prevails Without Unnecessary DNA Testing: Kerala High Court
TITLE: ROMEO VICTOR AND JENNY CHERUNNY V. CHERANALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SOUTH CHITTOOR, ERNAKULAM AND ORS. CITATION:
When a statutory provision clearly delineates the requirements for compliance, it is not permissible to read additional requirements into it.: Supreme Court
Title: K. Babu Versus M. Swaraj and others CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5975 OF 2023 Date of Judgment- February 12, 2024 CORAM: Justice Aniruddha Bose and J. S
NCLT does not have the authority to cancel the resolution plan of a secured creditor: Supreme Court
Title: GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VERSUS PRABHJIT SINGH SONI & ANR. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7590-7591 OF 2023 Date of Judgment- Fe
Conviction cannot be imposed based on statements made by untrustworthy witnesses: the Supreme Court
Case title: State of Haryana vs Mohd. Yunus & Ors. Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1307 of 2012 Decided on: 12.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice
Circumstantial evidence requires that the facts to support the hypothesis of the accused’s guilt: Supreme Court
Case title: Pradeep Kumar vs The state of Haryana Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1338 of 2010 Decided on: 05.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice B.R G
