ABSTRACT
At the core of many modern economies, insurance contracts provide protection against uncertain events and financial coverage against and risk. Nonetheless, there is frequent conflict between insurers and policyholders concerning issues of claim settlement, policy interpretation, or liability denial. In India, the resolution of such disputes is addressed by statutory enactments, judicial authorities, and regulatory frameworks. In addition to a brief overview of the authority of IRDAI, consumer forums, civil courts, and arbitration and their roles in the dispute resolution, the artcile illustrates the options and avenues of resolution available to the parties either through amicable settlements or litigation. Additionally, it illustrates the balance between consumer safe-guarding and insurer insolvency.
KEYWORDS
Insurance law, claims settlement, IRDAI, negotiation tactics, consumer protection, arbitration, judicial remedies, dispute settlement, Indian insurance disputes.
INTRODUCTION
Insurance contracts are unique because they are contracts of utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei), of adhesion (standard-form contracts) and the negotiation power of parties asymmetrical, the insured have little to no power. Disputes in insurance contracts commonly arise by way of delay in payment, partial payment, denial or repudiation of claims, or disagreement or uncertainty regarding the terms and scope of cover. Because millions of consumers and commercial enterprises rely on insurance, effective resolution of insurance disputes is important to maintain trust and confidence in this market. The legal response to insurance disputes in India is layered.
a. Regulatory Mechanism – The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) provides terms and directives for claims settlement and grievance redressal.
b. Negotiated Settlement – Negotiation prior to litigation, conciliation and mediation are encouraged to assist the parties in more efficient resolution of disputes.
c. Judicial Remedies – Complainants may escalate claims disputes to consumer forums, civil courts, arbitration tribunals or even the Supreme Court of India, depending on the type and quantum of claims made.
NEGOTIATION TECHNIQUES IN INSURANCE DISPUTES
1. The importance of pre-litigation negotiation
Policyholders and insurers frequently negotiate to settle their claims with litigation being an expensive and time-consuming option. Pre-litigation negotiation can serve multiple purposes: saving litigation costs, preserving business relations and the possibility of recovering the claim quicker.
Some common ideas include:
Using documentation as a negotiation weapon – Policyholders should keep careful records of premiums paid, communication between company and policyholder and materials submitted with a claim. A solid foundation of documentation puts you in a better position in negotiation.
Sending a legal notice and demand letters – Many times, sending a legal notice brings the insurer back to the negotiating table. Often extended litigation creates consequences, including reputational loss and financial sanctions.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) – Mediation and alternative dispute resolution have been seriously promoted by the IRDAI. IRDAI has instituted Integrated Grievance Management Systems (IGMS).
2. Modes of Consideration for Insurer and Insured
For Policyholders: Monitor your disclosure requirements. Use experts to develop valuation reports when available. For example, in a medical billing contest in health insurance, use a medical expert. For fire/marine insurance, have a marine surveyor. Monitor IRDAI time lines (settlement within 30-45 days of claim being filed)
For Insurers: Ensure that all repudiation is supported by exclusionary language in the policy and supreme court held case law. Use structured settlement offers to entice policyholders to avoid paying more than large lump sums. Use effective limitations on fund recovery where subrogation applies, especially in third party recovery.
3. Mediation and Ombudsman Mechanism
The Insurance Ombudsman, created by the Redressal of Public Grievances Rules, 1998 (as revised in 2017), compromises an important component of the consumer centered approach towards dispute resolution. The Insurance Ombudsman provides an inexpensive and expeditious method of resolving disputes up to ₹30 lakhs. The process of the Ombudsman is mostly conciliatory, yet his decisions are enforceable on the insurers if adopted by the complainant. This mechanism is based on the premise that not every dispute requires recourse to a formal judicial adjudication, thereby relieving the burden on the courts.
JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR INSURANCE DISPUTES IN INDIA
1. Consumer Protection Mechanism
The vast majority of the insurance disputes find their way to the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The Act specifically includes insurance as “service,” thus holding the insurer liable for “deficiency in service.”
District Commissions – claims up to ₹50 lakhs;
State Commissions – claims between ₹50 lakhs and ₹2 crores;
National Commission (NCDRC) – claims over ₹2 crores.
LIC v. Anuradha AIR 2004 SC 2070 wherein the consumer was compensated for a long delay in producing payment; New India Assurance v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage AIR 2016 SC 86 wherein the claim was arbitrarily repudiated. These cases reflect the pro-consumer approaches of the courts in the context of insurance disputes, particularly claims involving delay in paying out, and cases where there seems to be arbitrary repudiation by insurers.
2. Civil Courts and Remedies for Breach of Contract
In the event the claims involve complex policy interpretation or the damage being sought is in excess of the jurisdiction for consumer forums to provide relief, relief may be obtained in the civil courts. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 and the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 apply. The courts are likely to apply the contra proferentem principle (which is the principle of construing the ambiguity against the party that drafted the provision in this case, usually the insurer) when a policyholder requests relief.
3. Arbitration and Commercial Courts
Many of the insurance contracts available contain arbitration clauses so that the parties can refer disputes to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially in situations dealing with reinsurance and corporate insurance policies. Disputes can be referred to arbitration where parties seek confidentiality and want the benefit of technical expertise, though individual consumers may be discouraged by costs. Insurance disputes in commercial insurance that can exceed a threshold will also become subject to the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, but those disputes in courts would usually be dealt with sooner due to the exigencies of the Commercial Courts Act compared to the civil courts.
4. Writ Jurisdiction and Constitutional Remedies
Where there is a claim that violating fundamental rights, or action (or inaction) of some public sector insurer is arbitrary, policyholders can approach the High Court under Article 226 or the Supreme Court under Article 32. Although this process has been tightly constrained in private contractual disputes, it remains an alternative for claimants in egregious public sector insurer systemic regulatory deficiencies.
CONCLUSION
The framework for insurance disputes in India is an ongoing evolution of regulation, consumer protection, remedies for breach of contract, and determination by the courts. Methods of negotiation and dispute resolution that settle disputes efficiently, such as pre-litigation conciliation, mediation, and the Ombudsman system can provide effective systems for dispute settlement. Courts provide remedies at different levels of recourse, such as consumer forums, civil courts, arbitration, and writ jurisdiction. Next steps should involve:
Improving mediation and ADR in the context of insurance disputes to relieve courts of unnecessary caseloads.
Extending the Ombudsman’s powers and jurisdiction to handle disputes above certain materiality thresholds.
Encouraging and incentivizing insurers to create and promote dispute avoidance mechanisms that are based on transparency of policy drafting and digital grievance management.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more
than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal falls into the category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
Written by- Anwesha Anant
