Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“Decision of Arbitral Tribunal to not Implead a Party to Arbitration is not an Interim Award”: Delhi High Court
April 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: National Highway Authority of India v. Ms IRB Ahmedabad Vadodra Super Express Tollways Pvt. Ltd Case no.: O.M.P. (COMM) 455/2022 &

Zee And Sony’s Proposed Merger Encounters A Hurdle – A Closer Examination Of The Shelved Deal
January 28, 2024by Primelegal Team0

ABSTRACT: ZEE Entertainment and Sony’s Indian intended to merge to become one of the biggest entertainment companies in India. The two-year-o

Bombay HC dismisses petition which seeks for arbitration when the conciliation proceeding was abruptly terminated.
January 17, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Bafna udyog v Micro and Small enterprises, Facilitation council CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Neela Gokhale DATE :  16th  January 2024 CITATI

A single person cannot be party to arbitration when the arbitration agreement mandates joint holders to be a party : Bombay HC
January 9, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Ketan Champaklal Divecha V DGS Township Pvt. Ltd. & CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Manish Pitale DATE :  2nd January 2024 CITATION : Arbitr

Penalty Is Supposed To Be @ 1% Of The Cost Of Incomplete Work Per Week Of Delay Subject To Maximum Of 10 % Of The Total Cost Of Contract: High Court Of Delhi
Penalty Is Supposed To Be @ 1% Of The Cost Of Incomplete Work Per Week Of Delay Subject To Maximum Of 10 % Of The Total Cost Of Contract: High Court Of Delhi
November 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: National Projects Constructions Corporation Ltd. (Npcc) V M/S Aac India Pvt. Ltd Citation: Fao (Comm) 140/2021 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Just

To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
October 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. M/s Ganpati Overseas through its Proprietor Shri Yashpal Sharma & Anr Decided on: 06 O

The Delhi High court held that arbitrator has the power to award interest pendente lite
The Delhi High court held that arbitrator has the power to award interest pendente lite
October 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Punjab National Bank and Others V. Ram Murti Devi and Another Decided on: September 15, 2023 LPA 633/2023, CM Appl. 47587/2023, CM Appl. 475

Delhi High Court Navigates Arbitration in the Face of Fraud Allegations    
Delhi High Court Navigates Arbitration in the Face of Fraud Allegations   
September 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: M/S. JRA INFRATECH v. ENGINEERING PROJECTS(INDIA) LIMITED  Date of Decision: September 11, 2023  Case Number: ARB.P. 800/2022  Coram

Delhi High Court Resolves Arbitration Appointment Dilemma in Favor of Tata Capital
Delhi High Court Resolves Arbitration Appointment Dilemma in Favor of Tata Capital
September 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. v. MS Shree International & Ors.  Date of Decision: 04.09.2023  Case Number: ARB.P. 969/2022

Recourse Against Arbitral Award Under Section 37
Recourse Against Arbitral Award Under Section 37
August 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CONCEPT OF ARBITRAL AWARD – BRIEF INSIGHT The term “arbitral award” is defined under section 2(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.