Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
A single person cannot be party to arbitration when the arbitration agreement mandates joint holders to be a party : Bombay HC
January 9, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Ketan Champaklal Divecha V DGS Township Pvt. Ltd. & CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Manish Pitale DATE :  2nd January 2024 CITATION : Arbitr

Penalty Is Supposed To Be @ 1% Of The Cost Of Incomplete Work Per Week Of Delay Subject To Maximum Of 10 % Of The Total Cost Of Contract: High Court Of Delhi
Penalty Is Supposed To Be @ 1% Of The Cost Of Incomplete Work Per Week Of Delay Subject To Maximum Of 10 % Of The Total Cost Of Contract: High Court Of Delhi
November 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: National Projects Constructions Corporation Ltd. (Npcc) V M/S Aac India Pvt. Ltd Citation: Fao (Comm) 140/2021 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Just

To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
October 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. M/s Ganpati Overseas through its Proprietor Shri Yashpal Sharma & Anr Decided on: 06 O

The Delhi High court held that arbitrator has the power to award interest pendente lite
The Delhi High court held that arbitrator has the power to award interest pendente lite
October 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Punjab National Bank and Others V. Ram Murti Devi and Another Decided on: September 15, 2023 LPA 633/2023, CM Appl. 47587/2023, CM Appl. 475

Delhi High Court Navigates Arbitration in the Face of Fraud Allegations    
Delhi High Court Navigates Arbitration in the Face of Fraud Allegations   
September 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: M/S. JRA INFRATECH v. ENGINEERING PROJECTS(INDIA) LIMITED  Date of Decision: September 11, 2023  Case Number: ARB.P. 800/2022  Coram

Delhi High Court Resolves Arbitration Appointment Dilemma in Favor of Tata Capital
Delhi High Court Resolves Arbitration Appointment Dilemma in Favor of Tata Capital
September 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. v. MS Shree International & Ors.  Date of Decision: 04.09.2023  Case Number: ARB.P. 969/2022

Recourse Against Arbitral Award Under Section 37
Recourse Against Arbitral Award Under Section 37
August 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CONCEPT OF ARBITRAL AWARD – BRIEF INSIGHT The term “arbitral award” is defined under section 2(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Ineligibility Of Arbitrator As Per S.12(5) Arbitration Act Can’t Make Arbitration Clause Itself Invalid: Allahabad High Court:
Ineligibility Of Arbitrator As Per S.12(5) Arbitration Act Can’t Make Arbitration Clause Itself Invalid: Allahabad High Court:
August 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITLE: M/S Bansal Construction Office v. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 250 [Arbitration An

The arbitral award against Spicejet in favour of the company’s former promoter, Kalanithi Maran, is upheld by the Delhi High Court.
The arbitral award against Spicejet in favour of the company’s former promoter, Kalanithi Maran, is upheld by the Delhi High Court.
August 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  SpiceJet Limited v. Kal Airways Pvt Ltd & Ors. Decided on: 31st July, 2023 +  O.M.P. (COMM) 42/2019 & I.A. 1281/2019CORAM: HON

IBC | It Is Not Arbitrary To Send A Demand Notice To A Personal Guarantor In Line With Rule 7(1)
IBC | It Is Not Arbitrary To Send A Demand Notice To A Personal Guarantor In Line With Rule 7(1)
August 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Vineet Saraf v. Rural Electrification Corpn. Ltd.  Decided on: 21st July, 2023 + W.P. (C) 3293 of 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P