Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The petitioners were released on bail after being arrested under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.: High court of Patna
The petitioners were released on bail after being arrested under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.: High court of Patna
September 6, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was taken into custody under Sections 147, “ Punishment for rioting”, section 148, “Rioting, armed with a deadly weapon”, se

Accident claim -vehicle registered and insured in India – Accident in Nepal-Insurance Company liable to pay compensation – No extra premium can be charged for third party insurance even for extra territorial coverage: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Accident claim -vehicle registered and insured in India – Accident in Nepal-Insurance Company liable to pay compensation – No extra premium can be charged for third party insurance even for extra territorial coverage: Punjab and Haryana High Court
September 6, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It appeared that the competence of ‘India Motor Tariff’ to issue such instruction to limit the liability of the Insurance Company in te

Merely because complaint u/s138 NIA is filed–is no ground to quash the separate FIR u/s420/406 IPC. Offences u/s138 NIA and u/s 420/406 IPC not mutually exclusive. Both can go on side-be-side. No double jeopardy: Punjab and Haryana High Court
September 6, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It appeared that Article 20 of the Constitution of India prohibits the conviction of a person twice for the ‘same offence’ and not for

Challenging the NEET All India Quota of 27% OBC and 10% EWS reservations following Madras HC’s Judgement: Supreme Court
September 6, 2021by Primelegal Team0

On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a notice in a writ suit challenging the Central Government’s intention to adopt a 27 per cent OBC and 10%

Amendment that is merely seeking to refer to specific instances in support of the assertions in the plaint is necessary for a complete adjudication of the dispute between the parties : Delhi High Court
September 6, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The court always views both parties equally and defends the right to assert their point of view and stance equally. This was held in the judgment p

When a Tribunal which is the highest fact finding authority has given a categorical finding, the Court has no reason to interfere : Delhi High Court  
September 6, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A Tribunal is established to ensure that it categorizes and analyses the required categories justly, however the court will find no reason to quest

The account which is frenzied by the order of the special court will not be operated : High Court of New Delhi .
The account which is frenzied by the order of the special court will not be operated : High Court of New Delhi .
September 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The extra amount which was received from one of the parties is to be impugned transaction and also it can’t be prima facie termed as case propert

Conditions that can lead to a presumption of abetment of suicide by a married woman under Section 113A of the Evidence Act: Supreme Court
September 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Gumansinh @ Lalo @ Raju Bhikhabhai Chauhan Vs. State Of Gujrat  LL 2021 SC 415 the Supreme Court augmented that three circumstanc

Decision of the single judge held unreasonable on the grounds of interfering with the merits of the case: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
September 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

There was no justification to proceed against the appellants nor could learned Single Judge have entered into the merits of the decision taken by t

The Court should not interfere with the invocation or encashment of a bank guarantee so long as the invocation was in terms of the bank guarantee : Delhi High Court
September 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Encashment of bank guarantee of a party cannot be interfered by the Court unless and until there is a discrepancy in the terms of invocation of the