Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi Police Cleared of Blame as Forensic Science Lab Independence delays Beyond Their Control. – Delhi HC
Delhi Police Cleared of Blame as Forensic Science Lab Independence delays Beyond Their Control. – Delhi HC
December 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus SHADAB + CRL.M.C. 6288/2023 & CRL.M.A. 23536/2023 (stay) Decided on: 22nd December, 2023 CORAM: HON’BL

Past records of an employee is irrelevant if the misconduct is grave in nature to award compensation : Bombay HC
December 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Wheels India Ltd. V Ganesh Bajirao Vishwasrao CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V Marne DATE :  22nd  December, 2023 CITATION : WP No. 99

Transfer of professors within branches of same institutions should be of equivalent posts : Bombay HC on the transfer of Assistant professors to schools.
December 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Dhananjay Bhagwandas Devi V State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice A.S Chandurkar and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwala DATE :  22nd  

The Madras High Court has ruled on a disproportionate asset case, sentencing Tamil Nadu Minister Ponmudi and his wife Visalakshi to three years of simple imprisonment and imposing a fine of 50 lakh each.
The Madras High Court has ruled on a disproportionate asset case, sentencing Tamil Nadu Minister Ponmudi and his wife Visalakshi to three years of simple imprisonment and imposing a fine of 50 lakh each.
December 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: State v K Ponmudi and Others Case No: Crl A 53 of 2017 Decided on: 19th December, 2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN

The Madras High Court held that the plaintiffs forfeited specific performance by seeking the return of advance money due to inconsistent readiness during the agreement period until filing the lawsuit.
The Madras High Court held that the plaintiffs forfeited specific performance by seeking the return of advance money due to inconsistent readiness during the agreement period until filing the lawsuit.
December 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Kamalam vs. M.A. Abdul Rahman and Others Case No: A.S.No.211 of 2017 Decided on: 21st December, 2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S

High Court Of Patna Set Aside the order passed by the learned by the learned Additional Sessions Judge under the section of 302,120B and 201 of IPC as conviction to be based on no evidence
December 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE- Ramvinay Rai& ors Vs The State of Bihar Decided on-20/12/2023 +CR.APP NO.742/2017 CORAM-HON’BLE JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR AND

Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,unless the facts are crystal clear and lead to an irresistible conclusion that the arrest was in deliberate violation of the order of the court it would not be safe to indict the I.O & record a finding against her conduct – High Court of Patna
December 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE-Mayank Kumar Vs The State of Bihar &ors Decided on-21/12/2023 +CR.WJC NO.229/2023 CORAM-HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD FAC

Delhi High Court Directs Gender-Neutral Promotion: PETs’ Combined Seniority List from January 1, 2022, to Prevail, Averting Future Litigation
Delhi High Court Directs Gender-Neutral Promotion: PETs’ Combined Seniority List from January 1, 2022, to Prevail, Averting Future Litigation
December 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Government of NCT of Delhi versus Dilawar Singh & Ors. + W.P.(C) 6423/2021, CM APPL. 20183/2021 Decided on- 22 December 2023 CORAM: HON&

Permitting the prosecutrix to testify via two-way video conferencing doesn’t demeans accused right to fair trial as evidence recorded via video-conferencing may actually provide a better view. – Delhi HC
Permitting the prosecutrix to testify via two-way video conferencing doesn’t demeans accused right to fair trial as evidence recorded via video-conferencing may actually provide a better view. – Delhi HC
December 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Vinod Kumar & Anr. versus State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr. + CRL.M.C. 9100/2023 & Crl. M.A. 33976/2023 Decided on: 22.12.2023 CORAM:

The burden of proof to prove the unconstitutionality of a subordinate legislation lies heavily upon the party challenging it : Bombay HC
December 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Sandeep Thakur v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Arif S.Doctor DATE :  22nd  De