Bar Association is not a private entity – Karnataka High Court
Writ Petition against the Bar Association of the Court is maintainable in the Court of law. The Karnataka High Court in its recent judgment held th
Teacher will be benefited from the date of entry service into the university: Supreme Court
“Though the earlier service is to be counted for the purpose of giving benefit of promotion, but effective date for all purposes is only from the
Executing court can not go beyond the decree: Delhi High Court
Merely on the ground that the documents in favor of the Appellant are unregistered the Appellant cannot be non-suited without a trial, especially w
Application by person who is no way connected with criminal proceeding u/s 482 Cr. P.C. cannot be entertained by High Court: Supreme Court
“A criminal trial of an accused is conducted in accordance with procedure as prescribed by the Criminal Procedure Code. It is the obligation of t
No title can be conferred upon the Appellant, based on unregistered documents: Delhi High Court
“No trial would be required as even if these documents are taken on file as evidence, by virtue of them being unregistered documents, they would
College cannot adopt unfair means to grant admission: Supreme Court of India
A compensation of Rs. 10 Lakhs was granted to an MS Surgery course aspirant for illegally denying her admission into the college and granting an ad
The prescription has to be given only by institutionally qualified practitioners, for homeopathy medicines: Supreme Court
It goes without saying that Homeopathic medical practitioners have to follow the advisory dated 06.03.2020 issued by AYUSH Ministry, this remarkabl
Any ‘Person’ can approach the Competition Commission of India to inform on any anti-competitive practices: Supreme Court of India
No merits in the case to prove that the cab aggregators i.e. Ola and Uber were carrying out any anti-competitive acts. Further, the NCLAT finding t
If the Tribunal comes to a conclusion that it’s earlier judgment requires reconsideration, the Tribunal can refer the question to a larger Bench: Odisha High Court
This Judgment was delivered by the single bench comprising Hon’ble Chief Justice Mr. Mohammad Rafiq & Hon’ble Justice K.R. Mohapatra of Odi
Having not presented them self for Cross-examination, an adverse presumption has to be drawn against them: Supreme Court
This present Judgment was forwarded by this Hon’ble SC in the Civil Appeal case of Iqbal Basith & Others V. N. Subbalakshmi & Other
