In this case, the Appellant was a conductor with the Maharashtra State Transport Corporation (Respondent). During the period of service on 23.08.
In this case, the Appellant was a conductor with the Maharashtra State Transport Corporation (Respondent). During the period of service on 23.08.
Realising that the principle of continuous officiation is well settled, especially where inter-se seniority is not dealt with in the Rules, the Ful
The cognizance for extension of limitation awarded by the court during the Covid-19 pandemic was only on the ‘period of limitation’ and not the
A father does not own the daughter to dictate terms and every child has a right to use his or her mother’s surname. The child is free to use the
As per the provisions of Section 137 to 143 of the Evidence Act, the apprehension being entertained by the petitioners does not seem to have any le
The petitioner was taken into custody after being accused under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code,” Punishment for robbery.” This ar
Section 197 of the CrPC protects a public servant in cases where it can be established that the alleged offence was committed while he was discharg
The petitioner was taken into custody and was held behind bars under Sections 414IPC, “Assisting in concealment of stolen property”, section 34
Enactment of Motor Vehicles Act is welfare legislation with an objective to give financial aid to the victims of motor vehicular accidents and also
Where the court had ordered for regularization of service of the petitioner and the opposite party willfully disobeyed that order, then it would be