TITLE: RADHEY SHYAM YADAV & ANR. ETC. VS. STATE OF U.P. & ORS
CITATION: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.20-21 OF 2024 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 3877- 3878 OF 2022)
DECIDED ON: 3 JANUARY 2024
CORAM: JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI, JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
Facts of the Case
Three assistant teachers who were hired in 1999 at an Uttar Pradesh school were the subject of a civil challenge before the Supreme Court of India. When their paychecks were suddenly suspended in October 2005, they filed writ petitions seeking remedies in the High Court. The State suggested fraudulent acts in the appellant selection process and accused manipulation in the approval of assistant teaching positions. Nevertheless, there was no proof of collaboration or guilty behavior on the appellants’ behalf found in the inquiry report.
Legal Provisions:
The Supreme Court probably took into account pertinent legal requirements pertaining to due process, employment rights, and the authority’s ability to revoke or contest appointments when conducting its examination. The Court might have cited earlier decisions that set the rules guiding these kinds of cases, guaranteeing a reasonable and equitable conclusion predicated on accepted legal standards.
Issues Involved:
The State’s sudden cessation of paying assistant teachers’ salaries was the main matter that the Supreme Court heard. Citing accusations of deception, the State contended that the entire selection process should be cancelled. Whether the appellants engaged in any misconduct during the selection process and whether the State’s decision to stop paying them was appropriate constituted the major questions.
Court’s Observation and Analysis
The Supreme Court’s decision revealed a careful analysis of the arguments, conclusions, and facts. The Court emphasized the appellants’ innocence and the dearth of evidence that supported the State’s charges, citing prior legal decisions. After focusing on how unfair the sudden cessation of pay was, the analysis came to the conclusion that the appellants were not at fault. The State was ordered by the Court to pay 50% of back salaries and arrears, proclaim continuous service, and grant consequence advantages including notional promotion and seniority. Additionally, the State was authorized to send a show-cause notice to the school’s committee of management, with the potential to recoup one-third of the arrears in the event of a guilty verdict. This nuanced approach showcased the Court’s commitment to justice, fairness, and upholding the integrity of the selection process.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
Written by- Komal Goswami
