Case Title: SRI MANJUNATHA D R versus THE STATE OF KARNATAKA and others
Case No: WP No. 13494 of 2024
Decided on: 21st May , 2024
Quorum: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICER AMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
Facts of the case
In this matter, a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Indian Constitution was filed.Its goals are to grant the petitioner’s request for an interim plea and to overturn an orderi ssued by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal . In the interest of justice and equity,the petitioner asked the High Court to grant the interim prayer, order records from the Tribunal, and set aside the contested ruling . The High Court dismissed the petition ina accordance with its directive to Bangalore to make the necessary orders regarding the interim plea at the following hearing . The petitioner filed the current request after the Tribunal denied their request for an interim order of stay appeal.
Issues
1. What kind of case has Sri Manjunatha D R filed?
2. In the writ petition, what particular relief was requested by the petitioner?
3. With reference to the petitioner’s request for an interim prayer, what instruction did the High Court provide?
Legal Provisions
Articles 226 and 227 of the Indian Constitution are among the legal articles at issue in this case. Under these provisions, a writ petition was filed in an attempt to overturn an order made by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal and to gain the interim prayer that the petitioner had requested.
Appellant Contentions
In addition to requesting records from the Tribunal, the appellant also requested that the impugned ruling be set aside, that the interim prayer be granted in the interest of justice and equity, and that the court award any other remedy that it judged appropriate. Despite asking for an interim injunction of stay based on earlier Tribunal actions, the petitioner argued that no interim order was fulfilled, which resulted in the current High Court petition.
Respondent Contentions
The documents that were provided did not specifically address the respondent’s contentions in the case. On the other hand, the petitioner contended that in the interest of justice and equity, the interim prayer should be granted, the Tribunal’s records should be requested, and further relief should be granted. The petition was filed before the high Court as a result of the petitioner pointing out that the Tribunal had not issued an interim ruling in cases with comparable circumstances.
Court Analysis and Judgement
The petitioner has filed several contentions, but the Tribunal has not issued any orders on the interim prayer requested. The petitioner has posted the matter for consideration on 28.05.2024. The court has disposed of the petition, directing the KSAT, Bangalore to issue the necessary orders on 28.05.2024.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
Judgement Analysis Written by – K.Immey Grace
Click here to view the judgement
