Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The collective action of all the accused indicates sharing of common intention: Supreme Court.
February 16, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Ram Naresh vs State of U.P Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 3577 Of 2023 Decided on: 1.12.2023 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon

Private agreements cannot be enforced over public policy in slum rehabilitation schemes: Supreme Court
February 16, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Sayunkta Sangarsh Samiti & Anr. Vs The State Of Maharashtra & Ors. Case no.: Civil Appeal No. 1359 Of 2023 Decided on: 15.12.20

Delays in submitting documents proving his educational qualifications should not make him ineligible for selection for a post: Supreme court
February 15, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Shaila Tanaji Patil vs Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Case no.: Writ Petition No.15613 Of 2022 Decided on: 14.02.2024 Quorum: H

The act of sexual intercourse is not illegal under the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act of 1956: Supreme Court
February 14, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Bikash Kumar Jain vs State of Odisha Case no.: CRLMC No. 3390 of 2023 Decided on: 09.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Sibo Shankar Mis

Higher courts are required to follow judicial discipline and comity to uphold the law: Supreme Court.
Higher courts are required to follow judicial discipline and comity to uphold the law: Supreme Court.
February 14, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Directorate Of Enforcement vs Niraj Tyagi Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 843 Of 2024 Decided on: 13.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Be

When a statutory provision clearly delineates the requirements for compliance, it is not permissible to read additional requirements into it.: Supreme Court
February 13, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: K. Babu Versus M. Swaraj and others CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5975 OF 2023 Date of Judgment- February 12, 2024 CORAM: Justice Aniruddha Bose and J. S

Conviction cannot be imposed based on statements made by untrustworthy witnesses: the Supreme Court
February 13, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: State of Haryana vs Mohd. Yunus & Ors. Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1307 of 2012 Decided on: 12.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice

Circumstantial evidence requires that the facts to support the hypothesis of the accused’s guilt: Supreme Court
February 13, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Pradeep Kumar vs The state of Haryana Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1338 of 2010 Decided on: 05.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice B.R G

Test identification parade is not mandatory in investigation: Supreme Court
February 12, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Kishore & Ors. vs The state of Punjab Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1465 of 2011 Decided on: 07.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice A

“De Minimis Non Curat Lex: The Supreme Court emphasised that Law does not concern itself with trifles
February 12, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Vashist Narayan Kumar vs The state of Bihar & Ors. Case no.: Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2024 Decided on: 02.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Ju