Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MONIKA GUPTA Versus SANJAY BANSAL Date of Decision: 19.07.2023 + RFA(OS) 59/2019 & CM APPL. 19452/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: RABINDRA KUMAR SAHA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Judgment delivered on: 18th July, 2023 + W.P.(C) 9118/2023 & CM APPL. 34697/2023 CO

Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
July 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: LT COL PRAVAL PETER RETD & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Reserved on: 14th July, 2023 Pronounced on: 18 th July, 2023 + W.P.(C)

Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
July 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: DILIP KUMAR SAH versus PARSHOTAM ALIAS PURSHOTAM LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ANR. Date of decision:18thJuly, 2023 + MAC.APP. 133/

Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MHG IP HOLDINGS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, DELHI Date of Decision: 18th July, 2023 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 49/20

Delhi High Court set aside the show cause notice, order in original and order in appeal against the petitioner under section 107 of the GST act
Delhi High Court set aside the show cause notice, order in original and order in appeal against the petitioner under section 107 of the GST act
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Kartik Agarwal vs UOI Date of Decision: 18.07.2023 + W.P.(C) 9424/2023 and CM Nos. 36000/2023 & 36001/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUST

Delhi High Court Dismissed the petition seeking overturn the order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Delhi High Court Dismissed the petition seeking overturn the order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 vs VALLEY IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. Date of decision: 18.07.2023 + ITA 913/2019 CORAM: HON

Cartels and Competition Law in India
Cartels and Competition Law in India
July 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Abstract This Article gives an analysis on the topic of cartel and their nature and new era cartels. It also looks into the matter of impact of car

Delhi High Dismissed the Anticipatory bail due to the nature of gravity of offences committed.
Delhi High Dismissed the Anticipatory bail due to the nature of gravity of offences committed.
July 22, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: RAKESH KUMAR vs State (GNCTD) Reserved on: 17.05.2023 Pronounced on: 14.07.2023 + BAIL APPLN. 1571/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ

Delhi high Court quashed the FIR against the petitioner as the parties have voluntarily without any fear, force and coercion, and have decided to give quietus to the proceedings.
Delhi high Court quashed the FIR against the petitioner as the parties have voluntarily without any fear, force and coercion, and have decided to give quietus to the proceedings.
July 22, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: SH. MANOJ BISWAS AND ANR. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Date of Decision:17th July, 2023 + CRL.M.C. 4808/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE M