Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Mere membership of banned organizations is a  sufficient ingredient to incriminate without there being an overt act :SC
Mere membership of banned organizations is a sufficient ingredient to incriminate without there being an overt act :SC
April 25, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Jamsheed Zahoor Paul V. State of NCT of Delhi. Case no: CRL.A. 51/2024. Dated on: 24th April, 2024. Quorum: Hon’ble Mr Justice Suresh

The Meghalaya High Court has clarified that Section 23 of the POCSO Act holds individuals responsible for revealing a minor’s identity when reporting or contributing to news.
The Meghalaya High Court has clarified that Section 23 of the POCSO Act holds individuals responsible for revealing a minor’s identity when reporting or contributing to news.
October 31, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Shri Eric Ranee & 2 Ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr Decided on: 06.10.2023 Writ C No. – 79 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. B. B

The Calcutta High Court has emphasized that maritime claims require supporting evidence and should not be characterized by harsh or oppressive measures.
The Calcutta High Court has emphasized that maritime claims require supporting evidence and should not be characterized by harsh or oppressive measures.
October 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Hindustan Aegis LPG Ltd. vs. Owners of Vessel MT TSM Pollux. Decided on:  19th October, 2023. Writ C No. – 9266889 CORAM: Hon’b

The Punjab & Haryana High Court held that a prisoner’s potential to elude capture while on parole is insufficient grounds for denying them temporary release.
The Punjab & Haryana High Court held that a prisoner’s potential to elude capture while on parole is insufficient grounds for denying them temporary release.
October 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Kapil v. State of Haryana and others. Decided on: October 17, 2023 Writ C No. – 7247-2023(O&M) CORAM: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Lisa

Mob Lynching and Its place in legal system
Mob Lynching and Its place in legal system
July 31, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Abstract This article is based on the problem of mob lynching in India and what are the existing legal system on this issue, it further deals with

Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MONIKA GUPTA Versus SANJAY BANSAL Date of Decision: 19.07.2023 + RFA(OS) 59/2019 & CM APPL. 19452/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: RABINDRA KUMAR SAHA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Judgment delivered on: 18th July, 2023 + W.P.(C) 9118/2023 & CM APPL. 34697/2023 CO

Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
July 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: LT COL PRAVAL PETER RETD & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Reserved on: 14th July, 2023 Pronounced on: 18 th July, 2023 + W.P.(C)

Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
July 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: DILIP KUMAR SAH versus PARSHOTAM ALIAS PURSHOTAM LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ANR. Date of decision:18thJuly, 2023 + MAC.APP. 133/

Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MHG IP HOLDINGS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, DELHI Date of Decision: 18th July, 2023 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 49/20

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });