#legalnews Archives - Page 8 of 10 - Prime Legal Law Firm Blogs

No limitation would be applied in the cases where there is misrepresentation involved in acquiring land : Bombay HC

TITLE : Shri Hanumant Baburao Neharkar v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V. Marne DATE : 22nd December, 2023 CITATION :

Analysis of the constitutional provision of Article 122 with regards to suspension of members of parliament

Introduction : During the winter session of the parliament, more than 145 members of the parliament were suspended on account of opposition to the

Employee entitled to compensation although there was misconduct for his long service : Bombay HC on reducing the compensation amount

TITLE : Raptakos Breet & Company Ltd v Gajanan M. Sonawane CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V. Marne DATE : 22nd December, 2023 CITATION :

Separate possession and partition ordered by the collector cannot be disputed : Bombay HC

TITLE : Mahadev v Smt, Rukmani Govindrao Khatmode CORAM : Hon’ble justice Sandeep V. Marne DATE : 19th December, 2023 CITATION : W.P No

Court cant direct to reject plaint to return it to another court due to lack of jurisdiction : Bombay HC

TITLE : Shreem Electric Limited V Transformers and Rectifiers CORAM : Hon’ble justice Sandeep V. Marne DATE : 12th December, 2023 CITATION : Ap

Teachers cannot take the fall for the mistake of management during appointment of vacancy – Bombay HC

TITLE : Sandeep Chudaman Shinde v The State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble justice Ravindra V. Ghuge and Hon’ble Justice Y.G Khobragade DATE :

Child marriages in India: Developments in the view of the judiciary and legislations

Introduction: A recent study found that one in five girls and nearly one in six boys are married below the legal age of marriage. The study also fo

Sudden fight not murder under Section 302 IPC – Bombay HC

TITLE : Digambar @ Digu Baburao Shirole V The State of Maharashtra CITATION : Criminal Appeal No. 151 of 2018 CORAM : Hon’ble justice Smt. Vibha

Bombay HC held appeal not maintainable because it did not fulfill the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act

TITLE : Bank of India V Maruti Civil Works CITATION : Appeal Form Order No. 362 of 2021 CORAM : Hon’ble chief justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya An

Wife entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.PC if a man simply performs marital obligations : Bombay HC

TITLE : Alka Bhausaheb Bhad v Bhausaheb Ramrao Bhad and The state of Maharashtra CITATION : WP No 15368 of 2023 CORAM : Hon’ble justice Rajesh S.

Blogs And Articles