Defence representative for a workman is not permissible under inquiry proceedings : Bombay HC
TITLE : Ajit Bhagwan Sawant V M/s Parveen Industries Pvt Ltd. CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V Marne DATE : 8th January 2024 CITATION : WP No.
Census record is sufficient to prove scheduled tribe to certify them belonging to the community : Bombay HC
TITLE : Omkar v The state of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Ravindra v Ghuge DATE : 15th January 2024 CITATION : WP No. 13567 Of 2021 FA
Rape, Murder and Remission: Supreme Court on Bilkis Bano Case
“A woman deserves respect howsoever high or low she may be otherwise considered in society or to whatever faith she may follow or any creed she m
Criminal charges in a civil dispute is an abuse of criminal justice : Supreme court.
TITLE : Dinesh Gupta v The state of Uttar Pradesh CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath and Hon’ble justice Rajesh Bindal DATE : 11th January 2
Bombay HC calls demolition notice against the legal system, sets aside notice against shiv Sena member
TITLE : Sadanand Gangaram Kadam V Additional Commissioner, Konkan Bhavan and Ors CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N. Jadhav DATE : 6th January 20
A single person cannot be party to arbitration when the arbitration agreement mandates joint holders to be a party : Bombay HC
TITLE : Ketan Champaklal Divecha V DGS Township Pvt. Ltd. & CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Manish Pitale DATE : 2nd January 2024 CITATION : Arbitr
Constitutional Validity of Ordinance mandating 60% Kannada in sign boards
INTRODUCTION The Karnataka State government recently passed an ordinance which puts imposition on establishments such as shops, enterprises, and in
A person in managerial position cannot be termed as an workman under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 : Bombay HC
TITLE : Rohit Dembiwal v Tata Consultancy Services Ltd CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N Jadhav DATE : 2nd January 2024 CITATION : WP No 10523 o
Bombay HC dismisses the order set by appellate authority as the same person rejected the developer’s application for reconstruction
TITLE : S.K Realty v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N Jadhav DATE : 2nd January 2024 CITATION : WP No 13458 of 2023 FACTS
Review application is not valid for an order passed by a Quasi Judicial Body : Bombay HC
TITLE : Sitara Anil Sharma V The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Madhav J Jamdar DATE : 19th December, 2023 CITA
