Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Smaller disposal and detection teams can be constituted for bomb threats, the Delhi High Court said.
June 18, 2024by Primelegal Team0

The Delhi Police has informed the High Court of Delhi that smaller teams from their existing strength of five bomb disposal squads and 18 bomb dete

Unaided recognized private school is not required to take prior approval before fees hike- Delhi High Court.
Unaided recognized private school is not required to take prior approval before fees hike- Delhi High Court.

Case title: Action committee unaided recognized private schools v. Directorate of Education. Case no: W.P. (C) 5743/2024 and CM APPL. 23712/2024, C

The powers of the Metropolitan Magistrate cannot be usurped by parties with malafide intentions; they view the High Court as their only option in NI Act cases. High Court of Delhi
The powers of the Metropolitan Magistrate cannot be usurped by parties with malafide intentions; they view the High Court as their only option in NI Act cases. High Court of Delhi
August 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Vinod Keni & Ors. vs Technology Development Board  Decided on: 24th July, 2023 + CRL.M.C. 942/2023 & CRL.M.A. 3608/2023, CRL.M.A. 

Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MONIKA GUPTA Versus SANJAY BANSAL Date of Decision: 19.07.2023 + RFA(OS) 59/2019 & CM APPL. 19452/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: RABINDRA KUMAR SAHA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Judgment delivered on: 18th July, 2023 + W.P.(C) 9118/2023 & CM APPL. 34697/2023 CO

Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
July 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: LT COL PRAVAL PETER RETD & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Reserved on: 14th July, 2023 Pronounced on: 18 th July, 2023 + W.P.(C)

Delhi High Court released the petitioner on bail in the case under NDPS act and held that trial is likely to take time, thus cannot be kept in prison for long.
Delhi High Court released the petitioner on bail in the case under NDPS act and held that trial is likely to take time, thus cannot be kept in prison for long.
July 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: ANITA @ KALLO versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Date of decision: 18th July, 2023 + BAIL APPLN. 957/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT

The Delhi High Court: Petitioner allowed to file written statement; Can’t assume that it is not required in a divorce suit due to the filing for transfer petition before the SC.
The Delhi High Court: Petitioner allowed to file written statement; Can’t assume that it is not required in a divorce suit due to the filing for transfer petition before the SC.
July 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Babita vs Manish Shoukeen Date of decision: 18th July, 2023 + CM(M) 752/2023 & CM APPL. 23729/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVI

Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
July 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: DILIP KUMAR SAH versus PARSHOTAM ALIAS PURSHOTAM LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ANR. Date of decision:18thJuly, 2023 + MAC.APP. 133/

Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MHG IP HOLDINGS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, DELHI Date of Decision: 18th July, 2023 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 49/20