Bombay HC holds MBBS degree valid even though the reservation certificate is proven to be fraudulent.
CASE TITLE – Miss. Lubna Shoukat Mujawar v. State of Maharashtra CASE NUMBER – Writ Petition No. 132 of 2017 DATED ON – 09.05.2024 QUORUM
Mere smell of the alcohol in the breath Would not lead to a conclusive presumption of contributory negligence, Delhi High court
CASE TITTLE:RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD V.HAWA SINGH & ANR CASE NO:MAC.APP. 107/2016 ORDER ON:08 May 2024 QUORUM: J. DHARMESH SHARMA FACT
Power to modify the Orders of the original authority conferred to the appellant tribunal cannot be in dispute: Madras High court
CASE TITTLE: Regional PF Commissioner, EPF organization vs President officer EPF Appellate tribunal and ors. CASE NO:W.A(MD).No.298 of 2024 ORDER O
Validity of the use of loudspeakers by religious establishments in the lens of the judiciary
Introduction : The Gujarat HC[1] in its recent plea held that a 10-minute use of loudspeakers during Azan (religious Muslim prayer) to not be causi
The Party Is Obliged To Follow The Undertaking Given In Front Of Court: Patna High Court
Citation: CR. MISC. No.39089 of 2023 Decided On: 16-10-2023 Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma Introduction: The learned counsel for the
Giving The Colour Of Criminal Case To A Civil Dispute Is An Abuse Of The Process Of The Court: Patna High Court
Citation: CR. MISC. No.21467 of 2023 Decided On: 16-10-2023 Coram: : Honourable Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh Introduction: The petitioner h
Appeal Of Petitioner Dismissed As The Court Couldn’t Find Enough Ground To Question The Challenged Order: Patna HC
Title: Binesh Paswan v The State Of Bihar Citation: CR. MISC. No.21466 of 2023 Decided On; 16-10-2023 Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sha
Court Need Not To Intervene Where It Doesn’t Seem Fit To Intervene: Patna High Court
Citation: CR. MISC. No.21192 of 202 Decided On: 16-10-2023 Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh Introduction: The petitioner has
Bata questioned the status of such salesman as ‘workman’ under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently as ‘employee’ under the MRTU & PULP Act.
High Court of Bombay on Bata’s status of such salesman as ‘workman’ under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently as ‘employeeâ
