Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Gujarat High Court granted the petitioners’ request to quash the FIR and charge sheet, as the allegations of copyright and trademark infringement were deemed baseless and not applicable.

Case- State Of Gujarat vs Kantilal Narshibhai Bhimani   (R/CR.MA/1239/2019) Decided on: 23rd June 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Hemant M. Pra

The Gujarat High Court concludes that the impugned FIR is an abuse of process and an attempt to harass the applicant. Therefore, the court exercises its powers and quashes the FIR and all subsequent proceedings.

Case-  Shailesh Kalidas Bharwad vs State Of Gujarat (R/CR.MA/15849/2018 ) Decided on: 27th June 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt

The Gujarat High Court mentions that bail should not be cancelled on the assumption of the accused’s guilt and that the appellate or superior court can consider the correctness of an order granting bail if material facts or crucial circumstances were ignored.

Case-  Chetnaben W/O Manilal Chaudhari vs State Of Gujarat (R/CR.MA/2110/2016) Decided on: 22nd June 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Hemant M. P

The Gujarat High Court granted the petitioners’ request to quash the FIR and charge sheet, as the allegations of copyright and trademark infringement were deemed baseless and not applicable.
The Gujarat High Court granted the petitioners’ request to quash the FIR and charge sheet, as the allegations of copyright and trademark infringement were deemed baseless and not applicable.

Case- Atulbhai Rasikbhai Dudhwala vs State Of Gujarat (R/SCR.A/693/2014) Decided on: 27th June 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt I

The Gujarat High Court Rejected Teesta Setalvad’s plea and ordered her to surrender IMMEDIATELY in police custody.
The Gujarat High Court Rejected Teesta Setalvad’s plea and ordered her to surrender IMMEDIATELY in police custody.

Teesta Atul Setalvad vs State Of Gujarat (R/CR.MA/14435/2022) Decided on: 1st July 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Nirzar Desai Introduction The

The Gujarat High Court finds that reinstatement is not feasible after such an extended period, but the awarded compensation needs improvement. Therefore, the court enhances the compensation amount to Rs.1,50,000/- to ensure justice.
The Gujarat High Court finds that reinstatement is not feasible after such an extended period, but the awarded compensation needs improvement. Therefore, the court enhances the compensation amount to Rs.1,50,000/- to ensure justice.

Case- Gordhanbhai Dhamabhai Patel vs Deputy Range Forest Officer Decided on: 27th  June 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Rajendra M. Sareen Intro

The Gujarat High Court Division Bench found that a written complaint must be filed within 45 days, and in the absence of such a complaint, the seized property should be released without insisting on a bank guarantee.
The Gujarat High Court Division Bench found that a written complaint must be filed within 45 days, and in the absence of such a complaint, the seized property should be released without insisting on a bank guarantee.

Case Title MANSUKH ALIAS RAVJI GORASIYA V. THE STATE OF GUJARAT (C/LPA/717/2020) CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH and H

If the evidence is silent on the intention of the accused to have assaulted the deceased person, he cannot be prosecuted
If the evidence is silent on the intention of the accused to have assaulted the deceased person, he cannot be prosecuted
June 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Munnabhai Babubhai Makwana vs State Of Gujarat on 1 May, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice A.Y. Kogje R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 400 of 2014 with R/CRIMINA

Gujarat High Court dismisses petition citing lack of mandate in the GAR act that could compel the state authority to issue tender
Gujarat High Court dismisses petition citing lack of mandate in the GAR act that could compel the state authority to issue tender
June 13, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Shree Chamundamataji Dungar … vs State Of Gujarat on 4 May, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 72 of 202

When question of initiating action under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act arises, High Courts are under obligation to keep themselves within the bounds of their authority
When question of initiating action under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act arises, High Courts are under obligation to keep themselves within the bounds of their authority
June 12, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Hitarth Atulkumar Chag vs Sunil Ishrani on 1 May, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Ashutosh Shastri R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 345 of 2023 By way