Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
It is obvious that not every assault or injury to a specific individual results in public disorder. :Gujarat High Court
It is obvious that not every assault or injury to a specific individual results in public disorder. :Gujarat High Court
August 30, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Virendrasinh Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 13347 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia & Mr. M.R Men

The standard of negatively affecting the “maintenance of public order” cannot be met by merely suspecting a violation of law and order. Gujarat High Court
The standard of negatively affecting the “maintenance of public order” cannot be met by merely suspecting a violation of law and order. Gujarat High Court
August 30, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE:  Dharmesh Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 12965 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia & Mr. M.R

Gujarat High Court relied on a previous ruling  stating -A Constitution has firmly established the difference between a disturbance of “law and order” and a disturbance of public order
Gujarat High Court relied on a previous ruling stating -A Constitution has firmly established the difference between a disturbance of “law and order” and a disturbance of public order
August 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Amin Alauddin Shaikh through his Mather in Law Mumtazbi Ibrahimkhan Pathan Versus  State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 12618 of

The detaining authority is required to demonstrate that the impugned detention is meticulously in accordance with the procedure established by law: Gujarat high court
The detaining authority is required to demonstrate that the impugned detention is meticulously in accordance with the procedure established by law: Gujarat high court
August 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Aayasing, through his Father Sangatsing Versus  State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 12491 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr.

The difference between “law and order” and “public order” is completely unknown to state authorities: Gujarat high court
The difference between “law and order” and “public order” is completely unknown to state authorities: Gujarat high court
August 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE:  Dhruv Sureshbhai Sarvaiya Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 18, 2023 13117 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supeh

No coercive steps to be adopted during the investigation or chargesheet is filed under section 173 of Cr. P.C.: Gujarat high court
No coercive steps to be adopted during the investigation or chargesheet is filed under section 173 of Cr. P.C.: Gujarat high court
August 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

No coercive steps to be adopted during the investigation or chargesheet is filed under section 173 of Cr. P.C.: Gujarat high court TITLE:  Manojku

DRT is a quasi-judicial forum, this Gujarat high Court refrains from making any additional observations
DRT is a quasi-judicial forum, this Gujarat high Court refrains from making any additional observations
August 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE:  Biren Chandrakant Shah through LHS Dimple Biren Shah Versus Authorised Officer, Punjab National Bank Decided On-: August 17, 2023 1

Human beings are supreme, and their freedom cannot be limited unless their detention is absolutely necessary and their actions have an impact on “public order.” : Gujarat high court
Human beings are supreme, and their freedom cannot be limited unless their detention is absolutely necessary and their actions have an impact on “public order.” : Gujarat high court
August 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Asalam through Arshad Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 17, 2023 . 12790 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S .Supehia and M

Prima-facie evidence of the current applicant’s involvement in the pertinent offence,  calls for a thorough investigation.: Gujarat High Court
Prima-facie evidence of the current applicant’s involvement in the pertinent offence, calls for a thorough investigation.: Gujarat High Court
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Sanjaysinh Batuksinh Vaghela Versus State of Gujara Decided On-: August 17, 2023 4329 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Nizar S Desai I

Anticipatory bail rejected the accused under sections 406,420 and 120 due to the gravity of offence: Gujarat High Court
Anticipatory bail rejected the accused under sections 406,420 and 120 due to the gravity of offence: Gujarat High Court
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Sandipbhai Bhikhubhai Padsala Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 17, 2023 7336 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Nizar S Desai