Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Three significant eyewitnesses became hostile in front of the Sessions Court, and during cross-examination, they did not support the prosecution’s case Gujarat High Court considers the matter.
Three significant eyewitnesses became hostile in front of the Sessions Court, and during cross-examination, they did not support the prosecution’s case Gujarat High Court considers the matter.
September 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Vishal Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 28, 2023 9822 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. J.Vora INTRODUCTION-   The a

There is no nexus between the present complainant, and the  present accused charged under 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506(2), and 114 of the Indian Penal Code Bail granted Gujarat High Court
There is no nexus between the present complainant, and the present accused charged under 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506(2), and 114 of the Indian Penal Code Bail granted Gujarat High Court
September 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Alambhai Nurabhai Malek Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 28, 2023 7145 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Hasmukh INTR

The compounding of an offence punishable under Section 408 of the IPC only up to the amount of Rs. 2000 is not addressed in any way by Section 320 of the Cr. P.C. : Gujarat High Court
The compounding of an offence punishable under Section 408 of the IPC only up to the amount of Rs. 2000 is not addressed in any way by Section 320 of the Cr. P.C. : Gujarat High Court
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Kamlesh Ramchandra Wadhwani Versus State of Gujarat and Others Decided On-: August 25, 2023 340 of 2013 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr

It is possible to visualize the inconvenience mentioned in the petition filed under section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and give it some weight. : Gujarat High Court
It is possible to visualize the inconvenience mentioned in the petition filed under section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and give it some weight. : Gujarat High Court
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Madhuri Versus Lalit Shankarlal Gangvani Decided On-: August 22, 2023 304 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. J.C Doshi INTRODUCTI

Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Pappu Versus  State of Gujarat and Others Decided On-: August 22, 2023 4695 of 2014 INTRODUCTION-   The original accused has aske

The prosecution has utterly failed to prove this chain of events against the accused Gujarat High Court upholds the trial court conviction
The prosecution has utterly failed to prove this chain of events against the accused Gujarat High Court upholds the trial court conviction
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Nareshkumar Mangaji Khant Versus State of Gujarat   Decided On-: August 25, 2023 14 of 2016  CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. M.R Me

Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
September 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title – Pappu Versus  State of Gujarat and Others Decided On-: August 22, 2023 4695 of 2014 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. M.R Mengdey INTRODU

The severity of the crime and the alleged punishment will be considered before granting bail.: Gujarat High Court
The severity of the crime and the alleged punishment will be considered before granting bail.: Gujarat High Court
September 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Rahul Ajaykumar Singhal Versus AY Baloch Inspector of Police Decided On-: August 22, 2023 1202 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Su

Simple disruption of law and order that results in disorder is not always enough to justify action under the Act : Gujarat High Court
Simple disruption of law and order that results in disorder is not always enough to justify action under the Act : Gujarat High Court
August 30, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Rupabhai Ghelabhai Gamara Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 13369 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia &

The preservation of law and order undoubtedly helps to prevent disorder, but disorder is a broad category that can include anything from minor annoyances to catastrophic events.: Gujarat High Court
The preservation of law and order undoubtedly helps to prevent disorder, but disorder is a broad category that can include anything from minor annoyances to catastrophic events.: Gujarat High Court
August 30, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Vishnudatt Shukla Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 12622 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia & Mr. M.