VALUE OF TESTIMONY OF CHILD WITNESS EVIDENTIARY
ABSTRACT It is common for judiciary systems of the worlds to accept children’s testimonies to help solve issues including domestic violence, ra
Legal Framework for Child Witnesses in India: A Critical Analysis
ABSTRACT Witnesses are generally considered to be the root of all evidence from the process of investigation, to a legal proceeding or trials. A ch
No Evidence, No Case: Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Marital Dispute.
Abhishek Saxena v. State of Uttar Pradesh. Case No.: Criminal Appeal No. 3628 of 2023. Court: Supreme Court of India. Date: November 28, 2023. Quor
No Evidence, No Case: Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Marital Dispute.
Abhishek Saxena v. State of Uttar Pradesh. Case No.: Criminal Appeal No. 3628 of 2023. Court: Supreme Court of India. Date: November 28, 2023. Quor
Legal Examination of Signature Forgery In Cheque Dishonor: Delhi High Court.
Case Title: ISHWAR SINGH versus VIDYA SHRI DEVI Case No.: CRL.L.P. 1/2024, CRL.M.A. 18/2024 Dated on: FEBRUARY 29, 2024 Coram: HON’BLE MR. J
Supreme Court’s Ruling on Continuation of Trial Proceedings and Evidence Examination.
Case Title: THE STATE OF ODISHA VERSUS NIRJHARINI PATNAIK @ MOHANTY & ANR. Case No: Special Leave to Petition (Crl.) No.5758 OF 2018 Decided
“Even if a particular document is not disputed, the Court has the discretion to analyze the same in evidence”: SC
Case title:- Pankaj Singh Versus State of Harayana Case No:-CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1753/2023 Decided on:-March 21,2024 Quorum:- ABHAY S.OKA, J Facts of
“Even if a particular document is not disputed, the Court has the discretion to analyze the same in evidence”: SC
Case title:- Pankaj Singh Versus State of Harayana Case No:-CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1753/2023 Decided on:-March 21,2024 Quorum:- ABHAY S.OKA, J Facts of
“Even if a particular document is not disputed, the Court has the discretion to analyze the same in evidence”: SC
Case title:- Pankaj Singh Versus State of Harayana Case No:-CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1753/2023 Decided on:-March 21,2024 Quorum:- ABHAY S.OKA, J Facts of
If there are inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony, failure to recover the weapon of crime would be fatal to the prosecution’s case: Supreme Court
Case title: Ram Singh Vs State of U.P Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 206 Of 2024 Decided on: 21.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon
