Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Automation of Workforce GMB
AUTOMATION OF WORKFORCE AND THE FUTURE OF LABOUR LAWS
October 1, 2024by Primelegal Team0

ABSTRACT Advanced technological change in automation and AI systems today has shifted at a higher rate, posing basic questions as to how these chan

Supreme Court quashes Allahabad HC Judgment: States that Employees Of ‘Nagar Nigam Allahabad’ are liable for Statutory Contributions under ESI Act.

CASE TITLE – The Employees State Insurance Corporation Ltd. v. Nagar Nigam Allahabad & ANR. CASE NUMBER – Civil Appeal No. 1833 of 2024 DAT

The Kerala High Court ruled that employer-issued circulars cannot restrict an employee’s ability to receive treatment from the hospital of their choice.

Case Title: THE AREA MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Versus SHRI. P.T.RAJEEVAN Case No: MFA (ECC) NO.52 OF 2018 Decided on: 30th April , 2024 Qu

Empowerment of Private School Employees is a Constitutional Right- Justice Manmeet Singh Arora
April 30, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Social Jurist v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors  Case No.: W.P.(C) 888/2024  Dated: April 29, 2024  Quorum: Justice Manmeet Pri

JUDICIAL OFFICERS ARE NOT ON PAR WITH GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES: SUPREME COURT
January 26, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: All India Judges Association V. Union of India & Ors. Case no.: Writ Petition Civil no. 643 of 2015 Decided on: 04.01.2024 Quorum:

The Bombay High Court held that Municipal Corporation Employees in the Octroi Department Do Not Have a Vested Right to Commission on Fees Paid to Evaders
The Bombay High Court held that Municipal Corporation Employees in the Octroi Department Do Not Have a Vested Right to Commission on Fees Paid to Evaders
November 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Municipal Commissioner Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Ashish Laxman Chavan Decided on: 03 November, 2023 + Writ Petition No. 8953 o

Bombay HC:  Sweepers employed through contractors are   “employees” eligible for permanency benefits
Bombay HC: Sweepers employed through contractors are “employees” eligible for permanency benefits
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Municipal Corporation of City of Jalgaon v. Miraj Mahila Audyogik Cooperative Society Ltd., & Ors. Decided on: 22.08.2023 + WRIT PETITIO

Delhi High Court Denies Additional Increment to Employees Due to Non-fulfilment of Eligibility Criteria
Delhi High Court Denies Additional Increment to Employees Due to Non-fulfilment of Eligibility Criteria
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Vs SMT. SUNITA KUMARI & ANR Decided on:  10th August, 2023 +  LPA 62/2020 & CM APPLs. 4141/2020, 4142