Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi High Court ordered the respondents to shut down any coaching centers that were operating in violation of the MPD, 2021’s requirements
Delhi High Court ordered the respondents to shut down any coaching centers that were operating in violation of the MPD, 2021’s requirements
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Sanjay Singhal vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Case No: W.P.(C) 8534/2023 Decided on: 14.12.2023 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice

The period of 120 days for filing of written statement in commercial dispute shall commence from the date when the amended memo was filed- Delhi HC
The period of 120 days for filing of written statement in commercial dispute shall commence from the date when the amended memo was filed- Delhi HC
December 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Flipkart Internet Private limited v GoDaddy operating company LLC and ors. Decided on: 4th October, 2023 + CS(COMM) 370/2020 and O.A. 76/202

All the winding up petitions filed in the courts in which hardly any proceedings have taken towards winding up of the company have to be compulsorily transferred to the NCLT- Delhi High Court.
All the winding up petitions filed in the courts in which hardly any proceedings have taken towards winding up of the company have to be compulsorily transferred to the NCLT- Delhi High Court.
December 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Aakash Engineers & Contractors v. Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Decided on: 10th October, 2023 + CO.PET. 531/2016 & CO.APPL. 1671/

In spite of the release warrant issued the person was kept in judicial custody – The High Court of Delhi to consider
In spite of the release warrant issued the person was kept in judicial custody – The High Court of Delhi to consider
November 22, 2023by Primelegal Team0

+ W.P.(CRL) 2786/2023 Case Title: Sunil Kumar Dahiya v. The Director General of Prisons & Anr. Appearance Petitioner – Ms. Anannya Ghosh,

The Delhi High Court held that traveling overseas is not impeded by the vigilance inquiry’s pendency
The Delhi High Court held that traveling overseas is not impeded by the vigilance inquiry’s pendency
November 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Ruhi Arora v. Union of India and Ors. Decided on: 06 November, 2023 + W.P. (C) 14459/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Subramonium Prasad In

Flinging any liquid on another person or any substance other than acid is not an offense U/S 326B IPC –Delhi High court
Flinging any liquid on another person or any substance other than acid is not an offense U/S 326B IPC –Delhi High court
November 10, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Rashmee Kansal v. The State and Anr., W.P.(CRL) 712/2022 Appearance Petitioner: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Mr. Anshul Mit

Delhi High Court on the award debtor has raised a preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the enforcement proceedings
Delhi High Court on the award debtor has raised a preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the enforcement proceedings
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Delhi High Court on the award debtor has raised a preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the enforcement proceedings.

Delhi High Court Judgement on petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 .
Delhi High Court Judgement on petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 .
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Delhi High Court Judgement on petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 . Title : M/S ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS P

Simply asserting EVM was imperfect would not prove to be a false election without proof of material impact on the outcome:Bombay High court
Simply asserting EVM was imperfect would not prove to be a false election without proof of material impact on the outcome:Bombay High court
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case no. – Writ Petition No. 280/2023  Case Title – Meerabai W/o Dnyaneshwar Chatare v. Returning Officer to the Election Appearance Petitione

The Delhi High Court held that under the POCSO Act, a Light Touch Is Not “Manipulation” For Penetrative Sexual Assault
The Delhi High Court held that under the POCSO Act, a Light Touch Is Not “Manipulation” For Penetrative Sexual Assault
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Shantanu v. The State Decided on: 06 November, 2023 + CRL.A 160/2021 & CRL.M (BAIL) 121/2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Amit Bansal Intro

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });