Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
When an appealable decree is passed in a suit, no revision should be entered against the order that rejects review on merits: Supreme Court
February 19, 2024by Primelegal Team0

 Case title: Rahimal Bathu Vs Ashiyal Beevi Case no.: SLP (C) No. 8428 OF 2018 Decided on: 26.11.2023 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Pamidighantam Sri

Unscrupulous Litigants Should Not Go Scot-Free: Supreme Court
February 7, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Dinesh Gupta vs The state of Uttarpradesh Case no.: S.L.P.(Crl.) No.3343 of 2022 Decided on: 11.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Vikra

JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE: SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT LOWER OR SUBORDINATE COURTS DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONTRADICT THE DECISIONS OF HIGHER COURTS
JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE: SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT LOWER OR SUBORDINATE COURTS DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONTRADICT THE DECISIONS OF HIGHER COURTS
January 25, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Mary Pushpam vs Telvi Curusumary Case no.: civil appeal no. 9941 of 2016 Decided on: 03.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath F

Compromise decree would be binding on the party even though if he has not signed on it : Kerala High Court.
Compromise decree would be binding on the party even though if he has not signed on it : Kerala High Court.
January 5, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Ashiya Ummal v. S.N. Sathy & ors. Case No: RSA NO. 247 of 2023 Decided on:  3rd January, 2024 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.

In a case where the offence is charged in both POCSO and SCST Act, The jurisdiction to try the offence lie with POCSO : Bombay HC
December 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Aniket v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble justice Mangesh S Patil, Hon’ble Justice Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hon’ble Justice

Bombay HC held appeal not maintainable because it did not fulfill the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act
December 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Bank of India V Maruti Civil Works CITATION : Appeal Form Order No. 362 of 2021 CORAM : Hon’ble chief justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya An

The Karnataka High Court has affirmed that unaided educational institutions managed by linguistic minority bodies are eligible to receive funding under Section 98 of the Karnataka Education Act.
The Karnataka High Court has affirmed that unaided educational institutions managed by linguistic minority bodies are eligible to receive funding under Section 98 of the Karnataka Education Act.
November 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Rajarajeshwari Dental College and Hospital and Dr Sanjay Murgod Decided on: 12th, OCTOBER 2023 Writ C No. – 580 OF 2023 (S-RES) CORAM:

In an NDPS case, the High Court has granted bail owing to a 10-gram discrepancy in the inventory of seized charas: Bombay High Court
In an NDPS case, the High Court has granted bail owing to a 10-gram discrepancy in the inventory of seized charas: Bombay High Court
October 31, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sunil Shishupal Nayak v. State of Maharashtra Decided on: OCTOBER 23, 2023 Writ C No. – Bail Application NO. 1450 OF 2023 CORAM: M. S. Kar

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INFRINGEMENT AND PASSING OFF UNDER TRADEMARK ACT.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INFRINGEMENT AND PASSING OFF UNDER TRADEMARK ACT.
October 29, 2023by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION  A trademark is defined by the Trademarks Act of 1999 as something that can be visually represented and is able to set one personR

To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
October 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. M/s Ganpati Overseas through its Proprietor Shri Yashpal Sharma & Anr Decided on: 06 O