Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Consideration of property shall only pass to a stranger in the absence of a heir having a preferential right u/S 22 of the HSA, 1956: Calcutta High Court

An interesting, important and significant point was raised in the instant appeal as to whether the gift of an immovable property to a stranger to t

Mere possession in the property how long it be, does not ipso facto establish a right into a person allowed to continue in possession by a title holder: Calcutta High Court

In factual matrices involving property transfer, it has been observed in the instant second appeal that a mere possession of property does not equa

Substantial data relating to Covid-19 resources must not be tampered with: Karnataka High Court

It is necessary to ensure material documents relating to Covid-19 data and stock of medicines, oxygen cylinders, and Remdesivir available are not t

To prove whether a tweet is blasphemous or not, it must be judged from the standpoint of a strong-minded, prudent person: Bombay High Court

The test of a reasonable prudent person must be applied in deciding whether a tweet causes enmity or hatred between two groups or communities. It i

NO MEANS NO. NO DOES NOT MEAN YES: Himachal Pradesh High Court

While dismissing an application of bail for offenses under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act it was held that NO

The Court has no power under Article 226 to check whether academic qualification certificates are in consonance with the recruitment rules: Jammu and Kashmir High Court

In a situation where the academic qualification certificate is questioned by the selection/ appointing authority from the very existence and suppor

Section 34 of IPC does not envisage a separate act by all of the accused persons for becoming responsible for the ultimate criminal act: Madhya Pradesh High Court

The case under Section 302 of IPC is made out against accused Ashok and taking into account the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case coupl

A writ court should not ordinarily interfere with the quantum of punishment levied without sufficient reasons: Calcutta High Court
A writ court should not ordinarily interfere with the quantum of punishment levied without sufficient reasons: Calcutta High Court

The petitioner assailed an order dated 10th December 2019 (“the impugned order”) before the bench of Ravi Krishan Kapur J. The order had been i

In a commercial dispute, a notice asking for arbitration ought not to be construed too strictly: Calcutta High Court

A notice seeking for arbitration of dispute between the concerned parties should not be shrouded with technicality. The bench in Universal Consorti

If the Trial Court erred in reading the evidence on record, the High Court may Interfere: Supreme Court
If the Trial Court erred in reading the evidence on record, the High Court may Interfere: Supreme Court

When the Trial Court has erred in giving judgment with evidence on record which is acceptable or misreading the evidence, the High Court is justifi