Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Ignoring the requirement of public interest under Rule 67(1) Kerala Education Rules 1959, prejudicial to the intent and language of the provision: Kerala High Court

Under Rule 67(1) of the Kerala Education Rules 1959, ignorance of the Public Interest condition apart from the other three conditions for suspensio

Order XXIX Rule 1 Code of Civil procedure does not authorize the Directors to sign and verify pleading on behalf of Corporation: Karnataka High Court
Order XXIX Rule 1 Code of Civil procedure does not authorize the Directors to sign and verify pleading on behalf of Corporation: Karnataka High Court

Order XXIX Rule 1 Code of Civil procedure does not authorize the Directors to sign and verify pleading on behalf of Corporation unless the power is

Suit for recuperation of money can be documented only when there is a default of duty: NCLAT

The date of right to sue can be extended only when the debt is acknowledged by the Corporate Debtor within a limitation of three years. The judgmen

Preventive Detention cannot be used as a substitute for ordinary law: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Preventive Detention cannot be used as a substitute for ordinary law: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir

Preventive detention involves detaining a person without trial to prevent him from committing a crime in the future based on his past record with t

Purpose of detaining accused person is to secure attendance, not punishment: High Court of Uttarakhand

Detaining someone who has not been convicted by a competent court would compromise on the personal liberty which Indian law guarantees. This is why

Rule will be struck down, if it exceeds the authority conferred by the enabling act: Karnataka High Court

The provision has to conform to the statute under which the Rule is made and exceeding the limits of the authority conferred by the enabling Act is

There is a need for continuous monitoring of the implementation of the schemes in favour of the affected children: Supreme Court

The Court permitted the learned Amicus Curiae to have a dialogue with Nodal Officers to be appointed by the State Governments to ascertain the info

Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India: The High Court of Uttarakhand

The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the trial is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance o

The right to wages is an integral part of the right to livelihood and is entitled to protection under Art.21: Orissa High Court
The right to wages is an integral part of the right to livelihood and is entitled to protection under Art.21: Orissa High Court

The legislative scheme of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act places the “Right to Livelihood” at a higher pedestal than

The High Court is not and cannot act as a second court of the first appeal: Orissa High Court

It is very disconcerting that the High Court functioned as a disciplinary appeal authority and even re-evaluated the evidence before the investigat