Prime Legal Law Firm - Page 817 of 1005 -

“Appellate Authority is of the opinion that no interference of this forum is warranted…”: SEBI, Part 1.

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud

Regular second appeal denied when there is absence of any perversity and concurrent findings of fact: High Court of Bombay at Goa

In the present, a regular second appeal has been filed against the Judgments and Decrees dated 06.06.2019 and 06.03.2021 made by the learned Trial

Acceptance of public document could not be refused unless challenged: High Court of Odisha

In the present case, an appeal is preferred under section-100 of CPC in assailing the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge.

Fresh assessment to be made to replace a retrospectively calculated assessment in the absence of property owner : Delhi High Court

The order for assessment of property is required to respect certain rights to the property holder which includes his/her right to be present when t

Arbitration clause to be invoked even in the absence of response from the defendant: Delhi High Court

The existence of arbitration clause in a contract offers guarantee to the parties that in the case of dispute, it shall be solved amicably however

A New Arbitrator to be appointed after demise of earlier appointed sole Arbitrator : Delhi High Court

The practice of arbitration holds key importance in resolving disputes thereby making an arbitrator absolutely integral to the process, in the case

Claim to succession cannot be decided by a Revenue Tribunal: Telangana High Court

The claim of petitioners to succeed to tenancy rights of their ancestor cannot be decided by the Tahsildar and appropriate remedy from the civil co

Application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI act is not an automatic stay: Madras High Court

Merely on the ground that an application filed by the petitioner under Section 17 of the Act challenging the auction sale is pending, it cannot be

Petitioners released on bail after being arrested under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 333, 337, 324, 307, 353, 188 IPC.: High court of Patna

The petitioner was arrested under Section 147 IPC, “Punishment for rioting”, section 148, “Rioting, armed with deadly weapon̶

Petitioner released on bail after being arrested under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354B/34IPC: High court of Patna

The petitioner was arrested on the 11th of June 2020 under Section 341 IPC, “Punishment for wrongful restraint.” section 323, “Punishment for

Blogs And Articles