Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
In an Intra-Court Mandamus appeal, interference is usually warranted only when palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed: Sikkim High Court
October 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

While exercising extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court cannot continue illegalities, irregularities or i

The discretion to grant bail cannot be exercised if the role of the accused is not yet unfurled and still requires to be investigated in the case: Jammu and Kashmir High Court
October 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The accused cannot claim bail as a matter of right. The rule of bail and not jail cannot be pressed into service in the case of the applicant. Each

CM’s approval to committee’s decision renders it impliedly valid: Uttarakhand High Court
CM’s approval to committee’s decision renders it impliedly valid: Uttarakhand High Court
October 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A committee’s decision which has been approved by the Chief Minister of the state shall implicitly be valid. If a recommendation is made by the c

Sterling quality of evidence is required to rely upon the sole testimony: Bombay High Court
October 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In rape cases, the sole testimony of the victim is enough to prove the conviction of the accused, only if the proof is strong enough to prove the a

A resignation once accepted cannot be taken back : High Court of Delhi
October 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A person who has resigned which request having been accepted, cannot be allowed to rejoin his duties as held by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi t

The powers under Article 142 or under Section 482 Cr.P.C., are exercisable in post­conviction matters only where an appeal  is pending before one or the other Judicial forum. Supreme Court
October 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It cannot be understated that since members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe belong to the weaker sections of our country, they are more

Order for detention is invalid when it is made when the detenu is already in jail custody for an offence with no prospect of his release.: Jammu and Kashmir High Court
October 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

There must be awareness of the detaining authority of the fact that the detenu is already in detention and there must be compelling reasons justify

Every offence punishable under Sikkim Anti Drugs Act, 2006 shall be cognizable: High Court of Sikkim
Every offence punishable under Sikkim Anti Drugs Act, 2006 shall be cognizable: High Court of Sikkim
October 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

There were reasonable grounds for believing that he was not guilty of such offence and that he won’t commit any offence while on bail. Such was h

Mandate of Article 22(5) of Indian Constitution requires that the grounds of detention must be communicated to the detenu: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
October 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In view of the various laws laid down by the Apex Court vitiates the detention order, as not amounting to effect communication of grounds, and resu

Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court cannot convert itself into a Court of appeal: Hugh Court of J&K and Ladakh
Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court cannot convert itself into a Court of appeal: Hugh Court of J&K and Ladakh
October 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The High Courts, under Article 227 of the Constitution, have little scope to interfere with the orders of the subordinate Courts as a matter of rou