Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Police’s Inability To Timely Serve Summons, Execute Coercive Processes Violates Right To Speedy Trial Of Accused: Allahabad High Court
Police’s Inability To Timely Serve Summons, Execute Coercive Processes Violates Right To Speedy Trial Of Accused: Allahabad High Court
August 26, 2023by Primelegal Team

CASE TITLE:  Bhanwar Singh @ Karamvir vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 288 DECIDED ON: 24.08.2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Ajay Bhanot,J. INTRODUCT

CONTINUE READING
Relationship Between Logic & Experience Important While Invoking Precedents’: Allahabad High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail
Relationship Between Logic & Experience Important While Invoking Precedents’: Allahabad High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail
August 26, 2023by Primelegal Team

CASE TITLE:  Kusum Devi And Another v. State of U.P. and Another [Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. – 1907 of

CONTINUE READING
Impact of pegasus software on right to privacy.
Impact of pegasus software on right to privacy.
August 26, 2023by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION: The global impact of the Pegasus spyware scandal has elicited astonishment, prompting inquiries into the integrity of democratic syst

CONTINUE READING
No coercive steps to be adopted during the investigation or chargesheet is filed under section 173 of Cr. P.C.: Gujarat high court
No coercive steps to be adopted during the investigation or chargesheet is filed under section 173 of Cr. P.C.: Gujarat high court
August 26, 2023by Primelegal Team

No coercive steps to be adopted during the investigation or chargesheet is filed under section 173 of Cr. P.C.: Gujarat high court TITLE:  Manojku

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka High Court Rules Verbal Threats Without Intent Inadequate for Section 506 IPC Charges on Criminal Intimidation
Karnataka High Court Rules Verbal Threats Without Intent Inadequate for Section 506 IPC Charges on Criminal Intimidation
August 26, 2023by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Sugurappa @ Sugurayya Swami v. The State Of Karnataka Case NO: Criminal Petition No.201248 of 2021 Date of Order: 03-08-2023 INTRODUCTI

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka High Court: Foreign Fund Crediting Not Assured Solely by Permanent FCRA Registration, Ministry Clearance Necessary
Karnataka High Court: Foreign Fund Crediting Not Assured Solely by Permanent FCRA Registration, Ministry Clearance Necessary
August 26, 2023by Primelegal Team

Case Title: MANSA–Centre for Development and Social Action v. Managing Director, Development Credit Bank & Others. Case No: WRIT PETITION No.

CONTINUE READING
Bombay HC acquits a person convicted for corruption due to lack of evidence
Bombay HC acquits a person convicted for corruption due to lack of evidence
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team

Title: Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare v. State of Maharashtra Decided on: 22.08.2023 + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.610 OF 2004 CORAM: KISHORE C. SANT, J Facts of

CONTINUE READING
Bombay High Court : Petitioners, who are not part of the management, have the right to approach the court under Article 226 even though the provision primarily contemplates action by the management
Bombay High Court : Petitioners, who are not part of the management, have the right to approach the court under Article 226 even though the provision primarily contemplates action by the management
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team

Title: Nanasaheb Babasaheb Dharbale & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Decided on: 23.08.2023 + WRIT PETITION NO. 4978 OF 2022 CORAM: MA

CONTINUE READING
Bombay High Court declares compensation to the claimants of an “untoward incident” on the Railways
Bombay High Court declares compensation to the claimants of an “untoward incident” on the Railways
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team

Title: Ramesh Laxmanrao Dighade & Ors. v. UoI Decided on: 25/07/2023 + FIRST APPEAL N O . 1422 OF 2019 CORAM: SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J Facts of th

CONTINUE READING
Bombay High Court dismisses a petition under Sec. 127, MRTP Act for unreasonable delay
Bombay High Court dismisses a petition under Sec. 127, MRTP Act for unreasonable delay
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team

Title: Shri. Parag Prakash Mutha v. Kashinath Barku Bhalsingh & Ors Decided on: 18.08.2023 WRIT PETITION NO. 662 OF 2023 CORAM: CORAM: SANDEEP

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.