Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Throwing On Another Person Any Liquid Or Substance Other Than ‘Acid’ Not An Offence U/S 326B IPC: Delhi High Court
Throwing On Another Person Any Liquid Or Substance Other Than ‘Acid’ Not An Offence U/S 326B IPC: Delhi High Court
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Rashmee Kansal v. The State and Others Citation: W.P.(CRL) 712/2022 Coram: JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL Introduction: In a recent ruling, the Delhi H

To Curb Gun Problem, Make Bail Provisions More Stringent Like PMLA; Reverse Burden Of Proof: Amicus Tells Supreme Court
To Curb Gun Problem, Make Bail Provisions More Stringent Like PMLA; Reverse Burden Of Proof: Amicus Tells Supreme Court
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Rajendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Citation: M.A. No. 393 of 2023 in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 12831 of 2022 Coram: JUSTI

Delhi High Court on the award debtor has raised a preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the enforcement proceedings
Delhi High Court on the award debtor has raised a preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the enforcement proceedings
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Delhi High Court on the award debtor has raised a preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the enforcement proceedings.

Application In The Prescribed Manner Is Required For The Remedy Under Rule 12-B Of Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Rules: High Court Of Patna
Application In The Prescribed Manner Is Required For The Remedy Under Rule 12-B Of Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Rules: High Court Of Patna
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Binod Kumar v State of Bihar Citation: CWJC No.15688 of 2023 Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri And Honourable Mr. Justice Ramesh

Delhi High Court Judgement on petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 .
Delhi High Court Judgement on petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 .
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Delhi High Court Judgement on petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 . Title : M/S ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS P

The Owner Cannot Be Held Responsible Unless Evidence Is Placed That The Owner Is Also Involved In The Alleged Offences Under The Excise Act : High Court Of Patna
The Owner Cannot Be Held Responsible Unless Evidence Is Placed That The Owner Is Also Involved In The Alleged Offences Under The Excise Act : High Court Of Patna
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Citation: CWJC No.9207 of 2017 Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri And Honourable Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya Decided on: 07-11-2023

The High Court of Delhi laid back manufacturers from using the Nilkranti device mark in a suit by Nilkamal however holds no resemblance between the marks.
The High Court of Delhi laid back manufacturers from using the Nilkranti device mark in a suit by Nilkamal however holds no resemblance between the marks.
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title of the case: NILKAMAL CRATES AND CONTAINERS & ANR. CS(COMM) 707/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR Judgement dated: 06

Simply asserting EVM was imperfect would not prove to be a false election without proof of material impact on the outcome:Bombay High court
Simply asserting EVM was imperfect would not prove to be a false election without proof of material impact on the outcome:Bombay High court
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case no. – Writ Petition No. 280/2023  Case Title – Meerabai W/o Dnyaneshwar Chatare v. Returning Officer to the Election Appearance Petitione

The Allahabad High Court held that section 17 UP-Lokayukta And Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta Act Does Not Preclude High Court’s Authority Under Article 226
The Allahabad High Court held that section 17 UP-Lokayukta And Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta Act Does Not Preclude High Court’s Authority Under Article 226
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Masood Ahmad Khan v. State of UP and Ors. Decided on: 06 November, 2023 + Writ- A No. 10788 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Munir J Introdu

The Delhi High Court held that under the POCSO Act, a Light Touch Is Not “Manipulation” For Penetrative Sexual Assault
The Delhi High Court held that under the POCSO Act, a Light Touch Is Not “Manipulation” For Penetrative Sexual Assault
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Shantanu v. The State Decided on: 06 November, 2023 + CRL.A 160/2021 & CRL.M (BAIL) 121/2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Amit Bansal Intro