Custodial interogation is necessary for advocates accused of serious crimes: Bombay High court
Title: Hiral Chandrakant Jadhav Vs The State of Maharashtra Citation: ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3699 OF 2023 Coram: Justice SARANG V. KOTWAL
Dismissal of companies appeal in compensation case, commissioner Upholds penalty: Bombay High court.
Commissioner upholds penalty, dismisses company’s appeal in compensation case: Bombay HC Title: Shipping Corporation of India Limited Vs Mr.
Consent and subsequent actions binds defendant in compromise agreement: Kerala High court.
Case Title: Ashiya Ummal vs S.N. Sathy Case No: RSA NO. 247 OF 2023 Decided on: 3/1/2024 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. Badharudeen Facts of
Delhi High Court Advocates Swift Action in Organ Transplant Protocols….
Case Title: AMAR SINGH BHATIA & ANR. V. Sir Ganga Ram Hospital &Ors. Case No: W.P.(C) 3590/2020 & CM APPL. 12775/2020 Decided on: 4
“Delhi High Court Delineates Jurisprudential Boundaries in Revenue’s Royalty Dispute with Assessee in Hotel Industry, Emphasizing PE Presence and Urging Clarity on Taxability”
Case Title: Hyatt International Southwest … vs Dcit (International Taxation),… Case No: ITA 215/2023 & CM APPL. 18200/2023 Decided
“Landmark Judgment Upholding Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Court Sets Aside Arbitrary Transfer, Protects Medical Needs of Petitioner”
Case Title: Bhavneet Singh v Ircon Internatioal Ltd. through Chairman & MD & Ors. Case No: W.P.(C) 12404/2022, CM APPL. Nos. 37256/2022 &am
“International Jurisdictional Battle: Delhi Family Court Rejects Anti-Suit Injunction, Allows USA Divorce Proceedings in Disputed Matrimonial Case”
Case Title: Shri Sumit Sapra v Smt. Akansha Ahuja Sapra Case No: MAT.APP.(F.C.) 358/2023 & CM APPL. 62410/2023 Decided on: 3rd January 2024 C
Karnataka High Court passes a judgement against BDA for violating provision under section 69 of the KTCP Act
Title: Late H.H. Jyotendra Sinhji Vikramsinhji & anr v State of Karnataka & anr Citation: WP No. 1678 of 2018 Dated on: 15.12.2023 Corum:
The SC directed the (SEBI) and the Union government’s investigative agencies to look into whether the loss suffered by Indian investors as a result of the Hindenburg research and any other entities taking short positions violated the law.
Case Title: Vishal Tiwari v. Union of India Case No: W.P.(C) No. 162/2023 Decided on: 3rd January 2024 CORAM: DY Chandrachud, Chief Justice of In
The Supreme Court ruled that administrative High Court Chief Justices do not have the authority to usurp the executive’s regulatory authority.
Case Title: The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Association of Retired Supreme Court and High Court Judges at Allahabad & Ors Case No: CIV
