Inconsistencies in Modi Naturals Ltd: Supreme Court Interprets the VAT Act’s

February 6, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: M/S Modi Naturals Ltd  v. The Commissioner Of Commercial Tax Up

Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5822-5823 OF 2023

Decided On: 06.11.2023

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala

Facts of the Case:

Registered dealers are entitled to ITC for taxable items acquired inside the State under Section 13(1) of the UP VAT Act. But the key is in Explanation (iii) and Section 13(1)(a), which deal with the situation in which exempt items become byproducts of manufacture.

A problem arose with the Input Tax Credit on De-Oiled Rice Bran (DORB), an exempt by-product, for Modi Naturals, a registered dealer that produces Rice Bran Oil (RBO). The business argued that it should be able to receive the entire Input Tax Credit (ITC) for the taxable products it bought in accordance with Section 13.

Legal Provisions

The Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (the “UP VAT Act”) and the eligibility for Input Tax Credit (ITC) in relation to the manufacture of exempted items as byproducts during the manufacturing of taxable goods have been clarified by the Supreme Court. The M/S Modi Naturals Ltd. case reveals the complexities of Section 13 and its justifications.

Issues

Whether the Assessee is entitled to the full input tax credit (ITC) on by-products (DORB) generated during the production of taxable goods (RBO) was the main question put before the court.

Courts analysis and decision

The legislative aim was made clear by the Supreme Court when it examined Sections 13(1)(a) and 13(3)(b) with Explanation (iii). ITC is allowed for acquired commodities utilised in the production of taxable products under Section 13(1)(a). However, proportionality is introduced in the ITC with regard to the manufacturing of exempt items during the manufacture of VAT products by Section 13(3)(b). Explanation (iii) to Section 13, is the crucial point. It states that acquired goods are regarded as employed in the making of taxable goods if exempted goods are formed as byproducts during the manufacturing of taxable goods. The court made clear that when exempt items are generated as byproducts, this explanation precludes any disagreement regarding ITC.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

 

 Written by- Aastha Ganesh Tiwari

 

 

click to read the judgment

Primelegal Team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *