This case was filled by RajKishore Kumar, son of Nageshwar Prasad Yadav, resident of Mohalla Lal Darwaza, Town Munger, District Munger, Bihar- 811201 against the State of Bihar. The Judgment in RajKishore Kumar v. The State of Bihar (Citation: CWJC No.3169 of 2022) was served by HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
This case was a Public Interest Litigation filled before the Court seeking court to pass a writing the mature of mandamus commanding the respondents authorities to call for and held free and fair election of the trade union namely The Munger Tobacco manufacturing workers Union Basudeopur.
JUDGEMENT:
After going through the facts and arguments the court disposed off the petition and observed that The dispute is inter se the workers in relation to the management and affairs of the Union formed and registered under the Statute. The petitioner has grievances, if any, of the private respondent no. 7, not having conducted any election of the union, can be best raised and addressed before the appropriate authority provided under the Trade Union Act, 1926 and not by way of the instant petition filed in the nature of public interest litigation.
JUDGEMENT REVIEWED BY AKANKSHA.
This case was filled by RajKishore Kumar, son of Nageshwar Prasad Yadav, resident of Mohalla Lal Darwaza, Town Munger, District Munger, Bihar- 811201 against the State of Bihar. The Judgment in RajKishore Kumar v. The State of Bihar (Citation: CWJC No.3169 of 2022) was served by HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
This case was a Public Interest Litigation filled before the Court seeking court to pass a writing the mature of mandamus commanding the respondents authorities to call for and held free and fair election of the trade union namely The Munger Tobacco manufacturing workers Union Basudeopur.
JUDGEMENT:
After going through the facts and arguments the court disposed off the petition and observed that The dispute is inter se the workers in relation to the management and affairs of the Union formed and registered under the Statute. The petitioner has grievances, if any, of the private respondent no. 7, not having conducted any election of the union, can be best raised and addressed before the appropriate authority provided under the Trade Union Act, 1926 and not by way of the instant petition filed in the nature of public interest litigation.