Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Challenging the Compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for the victim injurie: Gauhati High Court
January 5, 2022by Primelegal Team

Nature of offence and the sentence inflicted with the length of litigation as well as the status of the accused served the cause of justice if the

A 28 week pregnant women allowed to undergo medical termination of pregnancy:Delhi High Court
January 5, 2022by Primelegal Team

MTP-DHC-31.12.2021 The question as to whether a women ahead of 24 weeks of pregnancy can be allowed to undergo medical termination of pregnancy was

Tribunal to adjudicate on the claims for the compensation which emerge from Motor Vehicle Accident: Gauhati High Court.
Tribunal to adjudicate on the claims for the compensation which emerge from Motor Vehicle Accident: Gauhati High Court.
January 4, 2022by Primelegal Team

The opposite party is liable to pay the compensation to the claimant for the death caused by the said accident. Motor Accident Claims Tribunals exe

Granting the Interlocutory Remedy is intended to Preserve the Status Quo as regards the Right of the Parties: Gauhati High Court.
Granting the Interlocutory Remedy is intended to Preserve the Status Quo as regards the Right of the Parties: Gauhati High Court.
January 4, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Provisions of Order XXXIX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the parties are at liberty to file an appropriate application before the court

Formulating the Substantial question of law under the Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Gauhati High Court
Formulating the Substantial question of law under the Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Gauhati High Court
January 3, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Appeal under the Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Challenging the judgement passed by the Civil Judge in the three Substantial questi

Captive users are not liable to pay the additional surcharge levied under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003: Supreme Court of India
December 11, 2021by Primelegal Team

So far as the captive consumers / captive users are concerned, they are not liable to pay the additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Act,

In the case of Minors, the conviction by the victim doesn’t require any interference: High Court Of Patna
December 10, 2021by Primelegal Team

The court found The case of the informant is a false one. There is no material to say that the witness is not reliable. The testimony given by the

IPC Section 304B- Statements with regards to involvement of a person in a crime, however justified, is not acceptable in the absence of proper evidence: Supreme Court of India
IPC Section 304B- Statements with regards to involvement of a person in a crime, however justified, is not acceptable in the absence of proper evidence: Supreme Court of India
December 9, 2021by Primelegal Team

Wherever this aspect has been referred to, a sweeping statement has been made that the husband and in-laws of the deceased had inflicted cruelty or

Rate of Interest Depends on Circumstances of a Case: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar
December 6, 2021by Primelegal Team

In the case of arbitration, rate of interest cannot be imposed at a uniform rate without looking into the circumstances of a given case, as observe

Prior Sanction for Prosecution is a Sine Qua Non for Cognisance: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu
December 5, 2021by Primelegal Team

Where so necessitated by law, prior sanction of a competent authority as mentioned in the respective statute for prosecution, is a sine qua non for